期刊文献+

“很好”与“挺好”语义句法差异及认知难点探析

An Exploration and Analysis of Semantic and Syntactic Differences and Cognitive Difficulties between"Very Good"and"Not Bad"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章对"很好"与"挺好"这两个词的意义与用法进行了探析,重点关注了如何立足语境来选用二者。文章对二者的使用条件及情况做出了假设,并验证了假设:在评判某个人或某件事物时,如果对评判者本身是完全有利的,起到了毫无疑问的促进作用,就应当选用"很好";而当被评判者对评判者来说起到的是勉强的、凑合的促进作用,不是完全有效的帮助,或是好的程度次于"很好",则应选用"挺好";此外,还应考虑日常用语习惯,即套语和语境对二者选用的影响。一般来说,当对被评判者没有任何意见时,我们多用"很好"来形容被评判者,而"挺好"则多用于单说,用来形容某人、某事或近况等。文章对如何正确选用二者进行了分析,针对外国汉语学习者的偏误给出了具体的对策。 This paper analyzes the meaning and usage of"very good"and"not bad",and focuses on how to use them in the context.Based on data analysis,this paper has proposed and verified the hypothesis of the conditions of their usage:when evaluating a person or something,if it is completely beneficial to the evaluator and has played a role in promoting undoubtedly,we should choose"very good";when the thing or the person plays a reluctant and impractical role in promoting the evaluator,not an effective help completely and the degree of good is inferior to"very good",we should choose"not bad";besides,we also should consider the influence of context and formula.When we have no opinions about the judges,we often choose"very good",while"not bad"is often used to describe recent situations.In this paper,analysis and countermeasures are given as to the relevant errors made by Chinese learners on this problem.
作者 紫馨月 ZI Xinyue(不详)
出处 《科教文汇》 2021年第4期71-74,共4页 Journal of Science and Education
关键词 很好 挺好 语义句法差异 认知难点 语境 套语 very good not bad semantic and syntactic differences cognitive difficulties context formula
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1谢军.英语套语及语用功能[J].外语与外语教学,2001(7):12-13. 被引量:26
  • 2左红珊广.《套语与词汇》评介[J].现代外语,2005,28(1):82-86. 被引量:75
  • 3Fillmore, C, J. The Need for a Frame Semantics in Linguistics [ J ]. Statistical Methods in Linguistics, 1976 : 5 - 12.
  • 4Jespersen, O. The Philosophy of Grammar [ M ]. London : George Allen and Unwin, 1924.
  • 5Nattinger, J. & Decarrico, J. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • 6Pawley, A & Syder, F. Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory : Native-like Selection and Native-like Fluency [ A ]. in Richards, J. &R. Schmidt ( eds. ) Communicative Competence [ C ]. London: Longman, 1983 : 191 -226.
  • 7Peters, A. The Units of Language Acquisition [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 8Wray, A. Formulaic Language in Learners and Native Speakers [ J ]. Language Teaching, 1999:32(4).
  • 9Wray, A. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon[ M ]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部