期刊文献+

IADPSG标准下75g和100g OGTT诊断GDM的价值比较 被引量:1

Comparison of diagnostic value of 75g and 100 g OGTT for GDM under IADPSG standard
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较IADPSG标准下75g和100g OGTT诊断GDM的价值。方法选取2017年8月1日至2019年8月1日在铜川市人民医院进行GDM筛查的1069例孕妇作为研究对象,其中573例进行75g OGTT(75g组),496例进行100g OGTT(100g组)。比较两组诊断GDM的临床价值。结果两组孕妇的空腹葡萄糖水平无显著差异(P>0.05)。75g组服糖1、2 h的葡萄糖水平低于100g组(P<0.05)。75g组采用IADPSG诊断阈值而100g组采用ADA诊断阈值时,75g组GDM诊断率高于100g组(P<0.05);两组均采用IADPSG诊断阈值时,GDM诊断率无显著差异(P>0.05)。采用IADPSG诊断标准时,两组的空腹、服糖后1 h阳性率无显著差异(P>0.05);75g组服糖后2 h阳性率低于100g组(P<0.05)。两组均采用IADPSG诊断阈值时,通过1个点阳性和2个点阳性诊断为GDM的占比无显著差异(P>0.05);75 g组通过3个点阳性诊断为GDM的占比低于100 g组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用IADPSG的诊断阈值时,75g OGTT与100g OGTT的GDM诊断率无统计学差异,但二者通过3个点阳性诊断GDM的占比稍有不同。 Objective To compare the diagnostic value of 75 g and 100 g OGTT for GDM under IADPSG standard.Methods A total of 1069 pregnant women who underwent GDM screening in people's hospital of Tongchuan from August 1,2017 to August 1,2019 were selected as the research objects.Among them,573 cases received 75 g OGTT(75 g group)and 496 cases received 100 g OGTT(100 g group).The clinical value of the two groups in diagnosis of GDM were compared.Results There was no significant difference in fasting glucose level between the two groups(P>0.05).The glucose levels of the 75 g group after taking sugar for 1 and 2 h were lower than those of the 100 g group(P<0.05).When IADPSG diagnostic criteria threshold was used in the 75 g group and ADA diagnostic threshold was used in the 100 g group,the GDM diagnostic rate of the 75 g group was higher than that of the 100 g group(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the GDM diagnostic rate between the two groups when IADPSG was used as the diagnostic threshold(P>0.05).When IADPSG diagnosis criteria was used,there were no significant differences in the positive rate of fasting and after taking sugar for 1 h between the two groups(P>0.05);the positive rate in the 75 g group after taking sugar for 2 h was lower than that in the 100 g group(P<0.05).When IADPSG diagnostic threshold was used in both groups,there were no significant differences in the proportions of GDM diagnosed by 1 spot positive and 2 spot positive(P>0.05);the proportion of GDM diagnosed by 3 spot positive of the 75 g group was lower than that of the 100 g group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion When the diagnostic threshold of IADPSG was used,there was no difference in the diagnostic rate of GDM between 75 g OGTT and 100 g OGTT,but the proportion of GDM diagnosed by 3 spot positive of the two was slightly different.
作者 耿丹 刘栋 GENG Dan;LIU Dong(Clinical Laboratory Department,People's Hospital of Tongchuan,Tongchuan 727000,China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2021年第4期121-123,129,共4页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 妊娠期糖尿病 葡萄糖耐量试验 葡萄糖剂量 诊断阈值 gestational diabetes mellitus oral glucose tolerance test glucose dose diagnostic threshold
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献85

  • 1Balion CM,Raina PS,Gerstein HC,et al. Reproducibility of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) classification:a systematic review.Clin Chem Lab Med,2007,45:1180-1185.
  • 2Hu DY,Pan CY,Yu JM. China Heart Survey Group. The relationship between coronary artery disease and abnormal glucose regulation in China:the China Heart Survey.Eur Heart J,2006,27:2573-2579.
  • 3Fonseca VA.Identification and treatment of prediabetes to prevent progression to type 2 diabetes.Clin Comerstone,2007,8:10-20.
  • 4DECODE Study Group on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology study Group. Will new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus change phenotype of patients with diabetes?Reanalysis of European epidemiological data.BMJ,1998,317:371-375.
  • 5Dedik L,()uri(s)ová M,Penesová A,et al.Estimation of influence of gastric emptying on shape of glucose concentration-time profile measured in oral glucose tolerance test.Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2007,77:377-384.
  • 6Kahn CR.Joslin糖尿病学[M].14版.潘长玉,主译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:550-552.
  • 7HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, et al. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. N Engl J Med ,2008,358 : 1991-2002.
  • 8International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care, 2010, 33:676-682.
  • 9American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011, 34 : S11 -$61.
  • 10Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakns GL, et al. Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care, 2011, 34: e61 -e99.

共引文献1463

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部