期刊文献+

床旁即时肺部超声结合压力-容积曲线设定PEEP对ARDS肺复张的临床评价 被引量:14

Clinical Evaluation of Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Combined with Pressure-volume Curve to Titration Adjust PEEP for ARDS Lung Recruitment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨床旁即时肺部超声(POC-LUS)结合压力-容积(P-V)曲线个体化调节呼气末正压(PEEP)在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)肺复张中的临床价值。方法对30例进行有创机械通气的ARDS患者进行研究,随机等分为超声再气化评分(US-RAS)指导PEEP设置的POC-LUS组和采用动脉血氧分压(PaO2)+动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)≥400 mmHg为依据调节PEEP的最大氧合法(Max-Oxy)组。两组均在机械通气开始时描记P-V曲线,分别采用呼气支最大曲率点(PMC)和吸气支低位拐点(LIP)设置初始PEEP。依据评估指标在第15 min、1 h、2 h、6 h、12 h、24 h、36 h及48 h的变化情况动态调整PEEP。同时记录各时间点患者的血气分析、呼吸力学等监护指标。结果两组患者基本情况差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),POC-LUS组与对照组初始PEEP值(11.2±0.9 cm H2O vs.8.4±1.8 cm H2O)差异有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。在施行肺复张过程中,POC-LUS组在第6 h的PaO2/FiO2(416.2±37.5)较前一时段升高(P<0.0001),此时调整得到的PEEP为(14.7±1.9)cm H2O,此后氧合逐渐好转。而Max-Oxy组的PaO2/FiO2在12 h(271.8±24.1)时才较前改善明显(P=0.0058),此时PEEP值为(13.5±1.3)cm H2O。两组各自确定的最佳PEEP值差异无统计学意义(P=0.0532),但POC-LUS组较Max-Oxy组提前6 h获得较好的肺复张效果(P均<0.05)。US-RAS与PaO2/FiO2呈负相关(r=-0.8725,R2=0.7613,P=0.0047)。研究中无不良事件发生。结论使用POC-LUS结合P-V曲线个体化滴定设置PEEP,有助于机械通气的ARDS患者较早地获得理想的肺复张效果,通过US-RAS调节PEEP改善ARDS患者氧合具有较好的提示意义。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of point-of-care lung ultrasound(POC-LUS)combined with pressure-volume(P-V)curve to individual titration positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP)in lung recruitment of acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS).Method A study was conducted in 30 invasive mechanical ventilated ARDS patients,whom were randomly averaged into two groups according to different PEEP adjustment,that POC-LUS group guided by ultrasound re-aeration score(US-RAS) and maximum oxygenation (Max-Oxy) group based on PaO2+PaCO2≥400 mmHg.P-V curve was traced at the beginning of mechanical ventilation in both groups,and the initial PEEP was set by the point of maximum curvature(PMC)of the expiratory branch and the lower inflection point (LIP)of the inspiratory branch.Then the PEEP was adjusted dynamically according to indicators of each group at the 15 min,1 h,2 h,6 h,12 h,24 h,36 h and 48 h.At the same time,blood gas analysis,ventilator and other monitoring indexes were recorded.Result There was no significance in baseline characters between the two groups (P all>0.05).There was significant in the initial PEEP between POC-LUS group and the control group (11.2±0.9 cm H2O vs.8.4±1.8 cm H2O)(P<0.0001).During the study,the US-RAS of POC-LUS group showed the PEEP(14.7±1.9 cm H2O) obtained PaO2/FiO2(416.2±37.5)after 6 h of adjustment was significantly higher than before(P<0.0001),and then the oxygenation gradually improved.In group of Max-Oxy,PaO2/FiO2improved significantly(P=0.0058)at the 12 h(271.8±24.1),and the PEEP was(13.5±1.3) cm H2O.There was no significant difference in the optimal PEEP between the two groups(P=0.0532),but POC-LUS group had a better effect of lung recruitment 6 h earlier than Max-Oxy group(P all<0.05).US-RAS showed a good negative correlation with PaO2/FiO2(r=-0.8725,R2=0.7613,P=0.0047).No adverse events happened along the study.Conclusion Using of POC-LUS combined with P-V curve individualized titration adjust PEEP was helpful to obtain ideal lung recruitment earlier in mechanical ventilated ARDS patients,and US-RAS has a indicated significance in adjusting PEEP for improving ARDS oxygenation.
作者 罗前程 刘瑞 曲凯丽 许磊 冯刚 郭东风 LUO Qiancheng;LIU Rui;QU Kaili;XU Lei;FENG Gang;GUO Dongfeng(Department of Emergency Medicine,Shanghai Pudong New Area Gongli Hospital,Shanghai 200135,China;Department of Critical Care Medicine,Shanghai Pudong New Area Gongli Hospital,Shanghai 200135,China;Department of Endocrine Medicine,Shanghai Pudong New Area Gongli Hospital,Shanghai 200135,China;Postgraduate Training Base in Shanghai Gongli Hospital,Ningxia Medical University,Shanghai 200135,China)
出处 《宁夏医科大学学报》 2021年第1期22-28,共7页 Journal of Ningxia Medical University
基金 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会科研项目(201640405) 上海市浦东新区卫生系统优秀青年医学人才培养计划(PWRq2017-09) 上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点专科建设项目(PWZzk2017-05) 上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点特色专病资助项目(PWZzb2017-18)。
关键词 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 肺复张 呼气末正压 床旁即时肺部超声 压力-容积曲线 超声再气化评分 acute respiratory distress syndrome lung recruitment positive end-expiratory pressure point-of-care lung ultrasound pressure-volume curve ultrasound re-aeration score
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献43

  • 1Sergio Sartori,Paola Tombesi.Emerging roles for transthoracic ultrasonography in pulmonary diseases[J].World Journal of Radiology,2010,2(6):203-214. 被引量:19
  • 2急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊断和治疗指南(2006)[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2007,16(4):343-349. 被引量:313
  • 3Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome : the Berlin Definition [J]. JAMA, 2012,307 (23) :2526-2533.
  • 4Doyle RL, Szaflarski N, Modin GW, et al. Identification of patients with acute lung injury. Predictors of mortality [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1995,152 (6 Pt 1 ) : 1818-1824.
  • 5Heckerling PS, Tape TG, Wigton RS, et al. Clinical prediction rule for pulmonary infiltrates [J 1. Ann Intern Med, 1990, 113 ( 9 ): 664-670.
  • 6Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2012,38 (4) : 577-591.
  • 7Bouhemad B, Brisson H, Le-Guen M, et al. Bedside ultrasound assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced lung recruitment [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2011,183 (3) : 341-347.
  • 8Bouhemad B, Liu ZH, Arbelot C, et al. Ultrasound assessment of antibiotic-induced pulmonary reaeration in ventilator-associated pneumonia[J]. Crit Care Med,2010,38 ( 1 ) : 84-92.
  • 9Caltabeloti F, Monsel A, Arbelot C, et al. Early fluid loading in acute respiratory distress syndrome with septic shock deteriorates lung aeration without impairing arterial oxygenation: a lung ultrasound observational study [J]. C rit Care, 2014,18 (3) : R91.
  • 10Brown LM, Calfee CS, Howard JP, et al. Comparison of thermodilution measured extravascular lung water with chest radiographic assessment of pulmonary oedema in patients with acute lung injury [J]. Ann Intensive Care,2013,3 ( 1 ) : 25.

共引文献487

同被引文献166

引证文献14

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部