期刊文献+

报童订购行为:订购成本与性别影响因素分析 被引量:3

Newsvendor's ordering behavior:Analysis on effects of ordering cost and gender
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文采用数理模型和管理实验方法研究报童订购量拉向中心偏差问题.首先,分析企业订购水平行为,得出采用对偶平衡策略,即多订购所导致的成本等于少订购所导致的成本,可解释此偏差;并且,在最差情况下,采用对偶平衡策略引发的成本不超过采用最优策略引发的成本的两倍.其次,分析企业订购调整行为,得出:第一,在高(低)边际利润情境中,相对于前期少订购给企业带来的影响,前期多订购给企业带来的影响较小(大);据此,企业可在高(低)边际利润情境中助推决策者关注少(多)订购造成的损失,以缓解拉向中心偏差.第二,相对于女性被试,男性被试的当期订购量受前期订购量的影响较小,表明男性对自我的界定和决策行为相对不易受外界因素影响,此研究发现提醒企业需关注两性在订购决策行为方面的差异. This paper aims to give a new perspective and further discussion of the pull-to-center effect in the newsvendor model,using the mathematical model and the management experiment method.Firstly,from the viewpoint of the level behavior of the order quantity,the dual-balance strategy where the total overage cost is equal to the total underage cost can well explain the pull-to-center effect.What's more,operations cost induced by the dual balance strategy is no more than twice that induced by the optimal strategy.Secondly,from the viewpoint of the adjustment behavior of the order quantity,two findings are derived.One is that the overage has less(more)effect on the order quantity than the underage order in the high-(low-)marginal profit situation.Hence,enterprises can nudge decision makers to pay more attention to the loss of underage(overage)order in high-(low-)marginal profit settings to ease the pull-to-center effect.The other is that compared with women,males’order quantities are less affected by underage(overage)order,which shows males’self-definition and decision-making behavior are not sensitive to external factors.Therefore,enterprises are advised to pay attention to gender differences in order behaviors.
作者 李娟 石玲 郑旖旎 LI Juan;SHI Ling;ZHENG Yi-ni(School of Management Science and Engineering,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210008,China)
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第12期63-74,共12页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71471086).
关键词 报童模型 对偶平衡 水平行为 调整行为 性别 newsvendor model dual balance level behavior adjusting behavior gender
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献124

  • 1添玉,黄道.一种损失规避供应链协调模型(英文)[J].控制工程,2006,13(4):366-369. 被引量:8
  • 2盛昭瀚,游庆仲.综合集成管理:方法论与范式——苏通大桥工程管理理论的探索[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2007,4(2):1-9. 被引量:47
  • 3Sterman J D. Business Dynamics: Systems qlainking and Modeling for a Complex World [ M ]. New York: McGrawHill, 2000.
  • 4Sterman J D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment [ J ]. Management Science, 1989, 35 : 321 - 339.
  • 5Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect[ J]. Management Sci- ence, 1997, 43 : 546 - 558.
  • 6Harris F W. How many parts to make at once[J]. Factory, the Magazine of Management, 1913, 10(2) : 135 -136, 152.
  • 7Silver E A. Inventory management: An overview, Canadian publications, practical applications and suggestions for future research[J]. INFOR, 2008, 46(1): 15 -28.
  • 8Axsa.ter S. Inventory Control[ M ]. Second Edilion. Berlin : Springer-Verlag, 2006.
  • 9Zanakis S H, Austin L M, Nowading D C, et al. From teaching to implementing inventory management : Problems of transla- tion[J]. Interfaces, 1980, 10:103-110.
  • 10Corbett C J, Van Wassenhove L N. The natural drift: What happened to operations research? [ J]. Operations Research, 1993, 41(4) : 625 -640.

共引文献147

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部