期刊文献+

喘可治注射液雾化吸入治疗支气管哮喘的有效性及安全性的系统评价 被引量:12

Efficacy and Safety of Aerosol Inhalation of Chuankezhi Injection for Bronchial Asthma:a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:系统评价喘可治注射液雾化吸入治疗支气管哮喘的疗效和安全性。方法:计算机检索Embase、Cochrane Library、CBM、CNKI、Medline、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库(VIP)和万方数据资源系统,筛选出喘可治注射液治疗支气管哮喘的随机对照试验,检索时限均为从建库至2019年4月。按照纳入和排除标准,由2名研究者独立进行文献筛选、资料提取,采用Cochrane系统评价手册进行质量评价,采用RveMan 5.3软件进行数据分析。结果:共纳入9个随机对照试验,包括842例支气管哮喘患者,其中观察组421例,对照组421例。Meta分析结果显示:1)有效性方面,喘可治注射液雾化吸入联合常规治疗干预支气管哮喘疗效在总有效率(RR=1.22,95%CI[1.15,1.29],P<0.00001)、肺功能FEV1实际值占预测值百分率改善(MD=6.03,95%CI[4.23,7.84],P<0.00001)、FEV1实际基础测试值(MD=0.44,95%CI[0.32,0.56],P<0.00001)、肺功能PEF实际值占预测值百分率(MD=6.03,95%CI[4.23,7.84],P<0.00001)、FEV1实际基础测试值(MD=0.58,95%CI[0.36,0.80],P<0.00001)方面优于单纯常规治疗;2)安全性方面,喘可治注射液雾化吸入联合常规治疗干预支气管哮喘的不良反应发生率与常规治疗比较差异无统计学意义(RR=0.59,95%CI[0.26,1.35],P=0.21)。结论:基于现有临床证据,喘可治注射液雾化吸入联合常规治疗干预支气管哮喘疗效优于单纯的常规治疗。但由于纳入研究的方法学质量普遍较低,因此后续的临床研究还需要严格的方法学设计和质量控制,以期提供更高质量的证据。 Objective:To systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of aerosol inhalation of Chuankezhi Injection for the treatment of bronchial asthma.Methods:Databases including Embase,Cochrane Library,SinoMed,CNKI and Wanfang Data were electronically searched in April 2019 for randomized controlled trials(RCTs)on Chuankezhi Injection for the treatment of bronchial asthma.According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,2 authors independently conducted literature screening and data extraction,and assessed the risk of bias of included studies.Then,meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.Results:A total of 9 RCTs were included with a total of 842 patients.Among them,there were 421 cases in the test group and 421 cases in the control group.Meta-analysis results showed:1)In terms of effectiveness,the total effective rate of Chuankezhi Injection aerosol inhalation combined with conventional treatment for bronchial asthma intervention(RR=1.22,95%CI[1.15,1.29],P<0.00001).The actual value of lung function FEV1 accounted for the percentage improvement of the predicted value(MD=6.03,95%CI[4.23,7.84],P<0.00001).The actual basic test value of FEV1(MD=0.44,95%CI[0.32,0.56],P<0.00001).The actual PEF value of lung function as a percentage of the predicted value(MD=6.03,95%CI[4.23,7.84],P<0.00001),the actual basic test value of FEV1(MD=0.58,95%CI[0.36,0.80],P<0.00001)is better than conventional treatment alone;2)in terms of safety,the incidence of adverse reactions of Chuankezhi Injection combined with conventional treatment for bronchial asthma is not statistically significant compared with conventional treatment(RR=0.59,95%CI[0.26,1.35],P=0.21).Conclusion:Based on the existing clinical evidence,the effect of aerosol inhalation of Chuankezhi Injection combined with conventional treatment for bronchial asthma is better than conventional treatment alone.However,because the methodological quality of the included studies is generally low,follow-up clinical studies also require strict methodological design and quality control in order to provide higher-quality evidence.
作者 段元元 吕健 王志飞 于丹丹 孙梦华 DUAN Yuanyuan;LYU Jian;WANG Zhifei;YU Dandan;SUN Menghua(Institute of Basic Medical Sciences,China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,China;Guang Anmen Hospital,China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100091,China)
出处 《世界中医药》 CAS 2021年第2期268-273,共6页 World Chinese Medicine
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1707400,2018YFC1707410)。
关键词 喘可治注射液 支气管哮喘 系统评价 循证医学 META分析 Chuankezhi Injection Bronchial asthma Systematic review Evidence-based medicine Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献113

共引文献377

同被引文献158

引证文献12

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部