国际工程合同效力及相关争议解决机制选择

The Validity of International Engineering Contracts and Relevant Dispute Resolution Mechanism Options

随着国家"一带一路"倡议的实施,中国建筑企业"走出去"承接国际工程业务规模逐年上升,投资风险也随之增加。国际工程合同的履行不仅受到项目所在国的政策、法律、文化等方面的影响,还因我国法律否认转包、再分包合同效力而可能存在效力问题。本文从国际工程转包和分包合同切入,结合案例分析此类合同的效力认定问题,并提出在出现合同纠纷的情况下,中国建筑企业的争议解决机制选择及其对纠纷处理结果的影响。

With the implementation of"The Belt and Road Initiative",the scale of Chinese construction companies"going abroad"to undertake international projects has increased year by year.And investment risks have also increased.The performance of international engineering contracts is not only affected by the policies,laws,and culture of the country where the project is located,but there may also be validity issues because Chinese laws deny the validity of certain forms of subcontracting.This article,focused on international engineering subcontracts,with analysis on the validity of such contracts by case study,proposes options of dispute resolution mechanism for Chinese construction companies and their impact on the outcome of dispute resolution in the event of contract disputes.