摘要
关于《魏书·太祖记》天赐三年"造石亭"的史料,李逸友先生认为"造"字应做"建造"解读,灰腾梁上遗迹是"北魏御苑"。张文平研究员提出不同意见,认为"造"字应做"造访"解读,该处遗迹是西汉长城。通过对《魏书》中"造"字的用法进行统计,对"造石亭"这条史料进一步解读,可以得出结论:将《魏书·太祖纪》中"造石亭"解释为"道武帝在灰腾梁上避暑期间游览前朝胜迹",从文献上来说缺乏确凿的证据与严密的逻辑,不能成立。
Upon the historical materials on the term"Zaoshiting"of Tianci Sannianin the book of Wei Shu·Taizu Ji,Li Yiyou thinks that the character"zao"should be interpreted as"build",and the ruins onHuitengliang are the"Imperial Garden of the Northern Wei Dynasty.Zhang Wenping put forward a different opinion that the character"zao"should be interpreted as"visit",and the site is the Great Wall of the Western Han dynasty.Through statistic analysis on the uses of the character"zao"in the book of Wei Shu and further study on the historical materials of"Zaoshiting",a conclusion is made that Zhang Wenping’s interpretation of"Zaoshiting"in Wei Shu·Taizu Ji as"a summer resort of the emperor Daowu Di on Huitengliang"is invalid for the lack of conclusive material evidence and rigorous logic.
作者
张旭
ZHANG Xu(School of History and Culture,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010022 China)
出处
《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2020年第6期37-43,共7页
Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
魏书
史料解读
灰腾梁
北魏御苑
Wei Shu
interpretation of historical materials
Huitengliang
Imperial Garden of the Northern Wei Dynasty