员工越轨创新行为的影响因素和形成机制——基于扎根理论的探索性研究被引量：2

Research on Antecedents and Formation Mechanism of Bootlegging:An Exploratory Research Based on Grounded Theory

下载PDF

导出

摘要员工越轨创新行为作为非正式创新的重要形式之一受到学界关注。基于扎根理论,厘清了越轨创新影响因素体系,它包括领导风格、员工特质、心理感知、组织情境4个主范畴,以及对应的28个子范畴;在此基础上,进一步构建了“组织事件→驱动因素→行为动机”的越轨创新行为形成机制模型,并基于此模型提出相关命题。研究结论丰富了越轨创新行为理论体系,也为创新管理实践提出了建议。 Bootlegging,as one of informal innovative behavior,is payed attention by academia.Based on grounded theory,we refine the critical antecedents of bootlegging,which includes leadership styles,individual characteristics,psychological perception and organizational situation.we further study bootlegging formation mechanism,build an EDM model and four propositions are put forward.The paper enriches bootlegging theory and also provides suggestion for innovation management.

作者赵乐王雷 ZHAO Le;WANG Lei(School of Business and Management,Donghua University,Shanghai 200051,China)

机构地区东华大学旭日工商管理学院

出处《上海管理科学》 2021年第1期58-65,共8页 Shanghai Management Science

关键词越轨创新影响因素形成机制扎根理论 bootlegging antecedents formation mechanism grounded theory

分类号 C933 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1李红,刘洪.组织中的建设性越轨行为研究回顾与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2014,36(8):45-52. 被引量：29
2黄玮,项国鹏,杜运周,刘洋.越轨创新与个体创新绩效的关系研究——地位和创造力的联合调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(1):143-154. 被引量：106

二级参考文献37

1韩翼,廖建桥,龙立荣.雇员工作绩效结构模型构建与实证研究[J].管理科学学报,2007,10(5):62-77. 被引量：247
2Baer M. Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(5):1102-1119.
3Bhal K T and Dadhich A. Impact of ethical leadership and leader-member exchange on whistle blowing: The moderating impact of the moral intensity of the issue[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2011,103(3):485-496.
4Bryant P C, et al. When rule makers become rule breakers: Employee level outcomes of managerial pro-social rule breaking[J].Em- ployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2010, 22(2) : 101-112.
5Crant J M, et al. Dispositional antecedents of demonstration and usefulness of voice behavior[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2011, 26(3): 285-297.
6Dahling J J, et al. Breaking rules for the right reason? An investigation of prosocial rule breaking[J]. Journal of Organizational Beha- vior,2012,33(1) : 21-42.
7Galperin B L and Burke R J. Uncovering the relationship between workaholisrn and workplace destructive and constructive deviance: An exploratory study[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2006, 17(2): 331-347.
8Galperin B L. Determinants of deviance in the workplace: An empirical examination of Canada and Mexico[D]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada,2002.
9Hung Hao-Kai, et al. Voice behavior and performance ratings: The role of political skill[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Man- agement, 2012, 31(2): 442- 450.
10Liao H, et al. Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quali- ty and differentiation on creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(5): 1090-1109.