期刊文献+

Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi,biochar,selenium,silica gel,and sulfur on arsenic uptake and biomass growth in Pisum sativum L.

原文传递
导出
摘要 Arsenic(As)is carcinogenic and highly toxic to plants.Crops accumulate As when grown in field soils irrigated with As-contaminated groundwater.The accumulation of As in roots,shoots,and grains of pea varieties can negatively affect human health via the food chain.This research is focused on the biomass growth and alleviation of As accumulation in roots,shoots,and grains of pea varieties in high As soil amended with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi(AMF),biochar(BC),selenium(Se),silica gel(Si-gel),and sulfur(S).Root,shoot,and grain masses were found higher in pea grown in As soil amended with AMF,Se,Si-gel,and S.Amendments with rice husk and sawdust BC was found less effective to increase growth parameters in Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute(BARI)Motor 2.Arsenic in grains was reduced by 77%,71%,and 69%by AMF,Se,and Si-gel,respectively.It is recommended that soil amendments with AMF,S,and Se have great potential for improving biomass production of pea grown in As-contaminated soil,as well as reducing As transfer to humans through the food chains.
出处 《Emerging Contaminants》 2020年第1期312-322,共11页 新兴污染物(英文)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献33

  • 1李进学,曹虎,张芬琴,李彩霞.Cu^(2+)和Zn^(2+)对普通小麦幼苗生长的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报,2005,14(4):59-60. 被引量:3
  • 2Anderson P S. 2010. Making biochar in small gasifier cookstoves and heaters. In Taylor P (ed.) The Biochar Revolution: Tra- nsforming Agriculture and Environment. Global Publishing Group, Victoria. pp. 154-182.
  • 3Beesley L, Moreno-Jim6nez E, Gomez-Eyles J L, Harris E, Ro- binson B, Sizmur T. 2011. A review of biochars' potential role in the remediation revegetation and restoration of con- taminated soils. Environ Pollut. 159: 3269-3282.
  • 4Budai A, Zimmerman A R, Cowie A L, Webber J B W, Singh B P, Glaser B, Masiello C A, Andersson D, Shields F, Lehmann J, Camps Arbestain M, Williams M, Sohi S, Joseph S. 2013. Biochar Carbon Stability Test Method: An Assessment of Methods to Determine Biochar Carbon Stability. Interna- tional Biochar Initiatiatives, Westerville.
  • 5Clare A, Barnes A, McDonagh J, Shackley S. 2014. From rhetoric to reality: farmer perspectives on the economic potential of biochar in China. Int J Agr Sust. 12: 440-458.
  • 6de Melo Benites V, de S Mendonqa E, Schaefer C E G R, Novot- ny E H, Reis E L, Ker J C. 2005. Properties of black soil humic acids from high altitude rocky complexes in Brazil. Geoderma. 127: 104-113.
  • 7Duku M H, (]u S, Hagan E. B. 2011. Biochar production pote- ntial in Ghana--a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 15: 3539- 3551.
  • 8FAO. 1983. Simple Technologies for Charcoal Making. FAO Fo- restry Report 41. FAO, Rome.
  • 9Ippolito J A, Laird D A Busscher W J. 2012. Environmental benefits of biochar. J Environ Qual. 41: 967-972.
  • 10Jeffery S, Bezemer T M, Cornelissen G, Kuyper T W, Lehmann J, Mommer L, Sohi S P, van de Voorde T F J, Wardle D A, van Groenigen J W. 2015. The way forward in biochar re- search: Targeting trade-offs between the potential wins. GCB Bioenerg. 7: 1-13.

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部