期刊文献+

论行政复议权集中行使——以《行政复议法》修改为背景

On the Centralized Exercise of the Power of Administrative Reconsideration——On the background of the amendment of Administrative Reconsideration Law of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据十九大报告提出的依法治国要求,《行政复议法》已经到了要修改的阶段。完善复议制度、真正发挥行政复议的独特优势是这次修法的重中之重。再结合日韩两国的制度改革经验对我们的借鉴意义和山东、浙江两省在机构深化改革背景下的实践探索和成效,未来的《行政复议法》要以法律条文的形式规定集中行使复议权;设置独立的行政复议机关、专业的行政复议人员,以及完善的复议信息公开制度来更好地适应法治社会的发展。 According to the requirements of governing the country according to law put forward in the report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China,the Administrative Reconsideration Law has reached the stage of revision.The most important thing in this amendment is to perfect the reconsideration system and give full play to the unique advantages of administrative reconsideration.Combined with the experience of system reform in Japan and South Korea for reference and the practical exploration and effect of Shandong and Zhejiang Province in the background of institutional deepening reform,the future administrative reconsideration law should stipulate the centralized exercise of the right of reconsideration in the form of legal provisions,set up independent administrative reconsideration organs,professional administrative reconsideration personnel,and perfect reconsideration information disclosure system To adapt to the development of the rule of law society.
作者 张霞 ZHANG Xia(Faculty of Law,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China)
出处 《天水行政学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2021年第1期113-117,共5页 Journal of Tianshui College of Administration
关键词 行政复议法 集中复议权 改革实践 完善措施 administrative reconsideration law centralized reconsideration right reform practice improvement measures
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献67

  • 1沈开举.委任司法初探——从行政机关解决纠纷行为的性质谈起[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,40(1):42-46. 被引量:18
  • 2Michael Harris and Martin Partington, "Introduction" in Administrative Justice in the 21^st Century, edited by Michael Harris and Martin Partington, Hart publishing, 1999, pp. 2 - 3.
  • 3Terence G. Ison,“‘Administrative Justice' : Is It Such a Good Idea?” in Administrative Justice in the 21^st Century, p. 22.
  • 4Administrative Review Council-Better Decisions: Review of Commonwealth Merits Review Tribunals-Report No. 39, September 1995, paras. 6.49 & 6.50.
  • 5Terence G. Ison, "Administrative Justice": Is It Such a Good Idea? in Administrative Justice in the 21^st Century.p. 39.
  • 6Administrative Law,8^th Edition, by Wade & Forsyth, Oxford 2000 pp. 894 - 897,888-889.
  • 7S. Skehill, "The Hidden Dimension of Administrative Law: Internal and First Tier Review - Ⅰ", in Administrative Law : Retrospect and Prospect(1987) 58 Camberra Bulletin of Public Administration 137,138.
  • 8[ 1964] AC40,p. 79.
  • 9(2000)61 ALD 577.
  • 10Comptroller-General of Customs v Kawasaki Motors, ( 1991 )32 FCR 219.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部