期刊文献+

认知扭曲问卷中文版测评抑郁症患者的效度和信度 被引量:3

Validity and reliability of Chinese version of the Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire in patients with depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨认知扭曲问卷(CDQ)中文版在抑郁症人群中的效度和信度。方法:选取抑郁症患者347例,其中145例(样本1)用于条目分析与探索性因子分析,202例(样本2)用于验证性因子分析;对所有样本进行信度分析,功能失调性态度量表(DAS)、负性自动思维问卷(ATQ)、贝克抑郁量表-Ⅱ(BDI-Ⅱ)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)测评用以检验效标效度。选取样本1中48人间隔2周重测。结果:条目与总分相关均有统计学意义(均P<0.001);探索性因子分析获得3个公因子,累积贡献率为50.84%;三因子模型优于单因子模型(IFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,CFI=0.93,FMIN=0.76,RMSEA=0.06);CDQ总分与DAS、ATQ、BDI-Ⅱ、BAI总分均正相关(r=0.51、0.64、0.62、0.39,均P<0.01)。总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.85,3个因子的α分别为0.84、0.62、0.58;总量表重测相关系数(ICC)为0.85,3个因子的ICC分别为0.83、0.86、0.92。结论:认知扭曲问卷(CDQ)中文版测评抑郁症人群具有良好的效度和信度。 Objective:To explore the validity and reliability of the Chinese-version Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire(CDQ) in patients with depressionin China.Methods:A total of 347 patients with depression were recruited in the study.Sample 1 including 145 cases was tested for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis,and sample 2 including 202 cases was tested for confirmatory factor analysis.All samples were analyzed for internal consistency reliability.The criterion validity was tested with Dysfunctional Attitude Scale(DAS),Negative Automatic thoughts Questionnaire(ATQ),Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ(BDI-Ⅱ) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory(BAI).Forty-eight patients from sample 1 were retested for test-retest reliability with two weeks interval.Results:The correlation between item and the total score was significant(Ps<0.001).Three factors were produced in the exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative contribution rate was 50.84%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed the three-factor model was better than the single-factor model(IFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,CFI=0.93,FMIN=0.76,RMSEA=0.06).The CDQ total scores were positively correlated with the total scores of DAS,ATQ,BDI-Ⅱ and BAI(r=0.51,0.64,0.62 and 0.39,Ps<0.01).Reliability analysis showed that Cronbach α coefficients of CDQ were 0.85 for the total scale,and 0.84,0.62,0.58 for the three factors.The ICCs of test-retest reliability were 0.85 for the total scale,and 0.83,0.86,0.92 for the three factors.Conclusion:The Chinese-version Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire(CDQ) shows good validity and reliability in patients with depression.
作者 钱丽菊 刘利 陈敏 刘超 王善梅 曹中昌 张宁 QIAN Liju;LIU Li;CHEN Min;LIU Chao;WANG Shanmei;CAO Zhongchang;ZHANG Ning(Jining Psychiatric Hospital,Shandong Depptment of Psychiabu,Jining 272651,Shandong Province,China;Nanjing Brain HospitalAffiliated to Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing210029,China)
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第3期220-225,共6页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 认知扭曲 抑郁症 效度 信度 cognitive distortion depression validity reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1张志群,郭兰婷.Beck抑郁问卷在成都市中学生中的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(7):486-487. 被引量:16
  • 2蒙家宏.大学生自卑心理特点[J].黔南民族师范学院学报,2006,26(2):81-86. 被引量:24
  • 3陈良,张大均.大学生心理健康素质的发展特点[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2007,33(4):129-132. 被引量:37
  • 4[1]Beck AT.Inventory of measuring clinical anxiety:Psychometric properties.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,1988,56:893-897
  • 5[2]Osman A,Kopper BA Barrios FX,Osman JR,Wade T.The Beck Anxiety Inventory:Reexamination of factor structure and psychometric properties.Journal of Clinical Psychology,1997,53:7-14
  • 6[3]Beck AT,Steer RA Garbin MG.Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory:Twenty-five years of evaluation.Clinical Psychology Review,8:77-100
  • 7[4]Wong CW.Negative affect structure of Chinese in HongKong :A psychometric investigation on anxiety and depression .Unpublished doctorate dissertation.Surrey:University of Surrey,1999.
  • 8[5]Bentler PM.EQS:Structural equation program manual.Encino:Multivariate Software Inc,1995.
  • 9[6]Barlow,DH.Clinical Handbook of Psychological Disorders(2ndED.).New York:Guilford Press,1993.
  • 10Beck AT,Ward CH,Mendelson M,et al.An inventory for measuring depression[J].Arch Gen Psychiatry,1961,4(6):561-571.

共引文献454

同被引文献24

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部