期刊文献+

证据中心设计理论在PISA2021创造性思维测评中的应用及其启示 被引量:6

Application of the Theory of Evidence-Centered Designin PISA 2021 Creative Thinking Assessment and Its Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 创造性思维是一种复杂的高阶能力,如何测评一直是教育测量的热点和难点之一。PISA2021创造性思维测评基于证据中心设计(ECD)理论设计和研制创造性思维测评工具。介绍ECD理论如何运用于PISA2021创造性思维这一高阶能力的测评,并从证据驱动实现测评标准实证化、信息技术增强促进测评问题情境化、多模态数据收集与证据多元化3个方面为我国基础教育素养测评提供参考建议。 Assessing creative thinking,the complex and higher-order thinking ability,has always been perceived as a popular but difficult area of educational measurement.The Program for International Student Assessment(PISA)will assess the 15-year-old students’creative thinking in 2021.The Creative Thinking Framework issued by PISA elaborates the pathways for designing and developing the creative thinking assessment instruments,which are based on the theory of evidence-centered design(ECD)and set evidencebased reasoning as the central theme.According to the framework,this article highlights how to use the theory of ECD to design and develop instruments for PISA 2021 creative thinking assessment,and provides valuable suggestions for literacy assessment for basic education.The suggestions are given from three perspectives:assessment standards should be based on the empirical evidence,information technology should serve for enhancing the contextualization of assessment tasks,and diversified ways should be sought to collect the multimodal data.
作者 袁婷 林静 YUAN Ting;LIN Jing(Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
机构地区 北京师范大学
出处 《中国考试》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期56-62,73,共8页 journal of China Examinations
关键词 ECD PISA 创造性思维 素养测评 ECD PISA creative thinking literacy assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献56

  • 1郑金洲.“教育口号”辨析[J].教育研究与实验,1998(3):27-30. 被引量:15
  • 2Mislevy, RJ., Steinberg, L.S. & Almond, R.G. Evidence-cen- tered assessment design [R]. Educational Testing Service, December 4, 1999. http ://www.education.umd.edu/EDMS/mislevy/papers/EC D_overview. html.
  • 3Mislevy, R.J., Almond, R.G., & Lukas, J.F. A brief introduc- tion to evidence-centered design [R]. New Jersey: Educational Testing Service (ETS), 2003, Research Report 03-16.
  • 4Mislevy, R.J., & Riconscente, M. Evidence-centered assess- ment design: layers, structures, and terminology [R]. PADI Technology Report 9, CA: SRI International. 2005.
  • 5Mislevy, R.J., & Haertel, G.D. Implications of evidence-cen- tered design for educational testing [J]. Educational Measurement: Is- sues and Practice, 2006, 25(4): 6-20.
  • 6Mislevy, R.J. Evidence and inference in educational assess- ment [J]. Psychometrika, 1994( 12): 341-369.
  • 7Gulliksen, H. Measurement of learning and mental abilities [J]. Psychometrika, 1961 (26) : 93-107.
  • 8Lewis, C. Test theory and psychometrika: the past twenty-five years [J]. Psychometrika, 1986(51 ): 11-22.
  • 9Mislevy, R.J. How cognitive science challenges the educational measurement tradition [J]. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2008, 6(1-2) : 124.
  • 10Missick, S. The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assess ments [J]. Education Researcher, 1994,23(2): 13-23.

共引文献1094

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部