期刊文献+

构建区域卫生健康工作评价指标体系的研究

Study on Constructing Evaluation Index System of Regional Health Work
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的构建一套与“健康中国”战略相符合,全面反映我国居民健康状况的评价指标体系。方法本文采用文献研究、专题小组讨论、思维逻辑、德尔菲法和层次分析法等一系列方法,对国内外文献进行分析归纳,构建指标库,并计算指标权重,最终构建出居民健康促进效果的评价指标体系。结果按照“三级预防”理念,对区域卫生健康工作进行梳理,构建包含全人群全生命周期区域卫生健康工作和区域卫生健康工作保障措施两个层级的指标体系,其中二级指标9个,三级指标42个。结论以健康效果为导向的卫生评价体系是符合国家政策方针的产物,可以有效的评价区域医疗卫生工作,评判医疗资源的公平性、可及性与连续性,对我国医疗卫生事业的发展具有推动作用。 Objective:To construct a set of evaluation index system which is in line with the strategy of“Healthy China”and reflect health status of Chinese residents comprehensively.Method:A series of methods in this paper such as literature research,thematic group discussion,thinking logic,Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were adopted to analyze and summarize domestic and foreign literatures,construct index database,calculate index weight,and finally construct the evaluation index system of residents’health promotion effect.Result:According to the concept of“three-level prevention”,the regional health work was sorted out,and the index system covering the whole population,and the whole life cycle of the regional health work and the regional health work guarantee measures were constructed,including 9 second-level indicators and 42 third-level indicators.Conclusion:The effect-oriented health evaluation system is a product of national policies and guidelines,which can effectively evaluate regional medical and health work,judge the fairness,accessibility and continuity of medical resources,and promote the development of China’s medical and health industry.
作者 宫芳芳 孙喜琢 李亚男 李文海 GONG Fang-fang;SUN Xi-zhuo;LI Yan-nan;LI Wen-hai(Shenzhen Luohu Hospital Group,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518001,China)
出处 《现代医院管理》 2021年第1期13-16,共4页 Modern Hospital Management
关键词 健康效果 区域卫生工作 评价指标体系 health effect regional health work evaluation index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献109

  • 1Bernier N F.Quebec\'s approach to population health: an overview of policy content and organization[J]. J Public Health Policy, 2006, 27(1): 22-37.
  • 2Bierman A S. Project for an Ontario Women\'s Health Evidence Based Report[R]. Toronto: Echo: Improving Women\'s Health in Ontario, 2009.
  • 3Bierman A S. Project for an Ontario Women\'s Health Evidence Based Report[R]. Toronto: Echo: Improving Women\'s Health in Ontario, 2010.
  • 4Commision on the Social Determinants of Health (CSDH). Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.
  • 5Freiler A, Muntaner C, Shankardass K et al. Glossary for the implementation of health in all policies (HiAP)[J]. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2013, 67(2): 1068-1072.
  • 6Greenhalgh T, Russell J, Ashcroft R E, et al. Why national eHealth programs need dead philosophers: Wittgensteinian reflections on policymakers\' reluctance to learn from history[J]. Milbank Quarterly, 2011, 89(4): 533-63.
  • 7Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Westhorp G, et al. Protocol—realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES)[J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011, 11: 115.
  • 8Jagosh J, Pluye P, Macaulay AC et al. Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review[J]. Implementation Science, 2011, 6: 24.
  • 9Jagosh J, Macaulay A C, Pluye P, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice[J]. Milbank Quarterly, 2012, 90(2): 311-46.
  • 10Jacobs J A, Jones E,Gabella B A, et al. Tools for implementing an evidence-based approach in public health practice[J]. Preventing Chronic Disease, 2012, 9: E116.

共引文献423

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部