期刊文献+

中间联合头侧入路腹腔镜直肠癌手术的效果及对253淋巴结清扫数目的影响

Effect of intermediate combined cephalic approach laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery and its influence on 253 lymph node dissection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨中间联合头侧入路腹腔镜直肠癌手术的临床疗效。方法选取郑州人民医院2018年7月至2019年10月行腹腔镜直肠癌手术治疗的90例直肠癌患者,采用抽签法分为观察组和对照组,每组45例。对照组采用传统中间入路,观察组采用中间联合头侧入路,比较两组术中出血量、术后住院时间、清扫253淋巴结时间、253淋巴结清扫数目、术后并发症发生率。结果两组术中出血量、术后住院时间比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组手术时间长于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组253淋巴结清扫时间较对照组缩短,253淋巴结清扫数目较对照组多(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率(13.33%,6/45)略低于对照组(15.56%,7/45),但差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相较于传统中间入路,中间联合头侧入路用于腹腔镜直肠癌手术可提高253淋巴结清扫数目,缩短253淋巴结清扫时间,降低术后并发症发生风险,具有较高的临床应用价值。 Objective To investigate the effect of intermediate combined cephalic approach laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery and its influence on 253 lymph node dissection in patients with rectal cancer.Methods From July 2018 to October 2019,90 patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic surgery were selected and divided into observation group and control group by drawing lots,with 45 cases in each group.The control group used the traditional middle approach,and the observation group adopted the middle combined cephalic approach.The operation,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,time of 253 lymph node dissection,the number of 253 lymph node dissection and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay betwen the two groups(P>0.05).The operation time in observation group was longer than that in the control group(P<0.05).The 253 lymph node dissection time in observation group was shorter than that in the control group,and the 253 lymph node dissection number in observation group was more than that in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group(13.33%)was slightly lower than that in the control group(15.56%),but there was no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusions Compared with the traditional middle approach,intermediate combined head side approach can increase the number of 253 lymph node dissection,shorten the time of 253 lymph node dissection,and reduce the risk of postoperative complications.
作者 许召杰 张胜威 李瑞 Xu Zhaojie;Zhang Shengwei;Li Rui(Department of Anorectal Surgery,Zhengzhou People’s Hospital,Zhengzhou 450000,China;Henan Provincial Key Laboratory of Children’s Genetics and Metabolic Diseases,Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhendzhou University,Zhengzhou 450018,China)
出处 《临床医学》 CAS 2020年第12期4-6,共3页 Clinical Medicine
基金 河南省医学科技攻关计划(联合共建项目)(2018020660)。
关键词 直肠癌 腹腔镜手术 中间联合头侧入路 253淋巴结 Rectal cancer Laparoscopic surgery Intermediate combined cephalic approach 253 lymph node
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献63

  • 1Sheung-Tat Fan.Precise hepatectomy guided by the middle hepatic vein[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2007,6(4):430-434. 被引量:77
  • 2Liang JT, Lai HS, Huang KC, et al. Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopic dissection sequences for resection of rectosigmoid cancers: randomized con- trolled clinical trial [ J ]. World J Surg, 2003,27 ( 2 ) : 190-196. DOI : 10. 1007/s00268-002-6437- y.
  • 3Kawamura Y J, Sakuragi M, Togashi K, et al. Distribution of lymph node metastasis in T1 sigmoid colon carcinoma: should we ligate the inferior mesentericartePy [ J ]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2005,40 ( 7 ) : 858- 861. DOI : 10.1080/00365520510015746.
  • 4Pandey D. Survival benefit of high ligation of the inferior mesenter- ic artery in sigmoid colon or rectal cancer surgery ( Br J Surg, 2006,93:609-615 ) [ J]. Br J Surg,2006,93 ( 8 ) : 1023. DOI : 10. 1002/bjs. 5551.
  • 5Uehara K, Yamamoto S, Fujita S, et al. hnpact of Upward Lymph Node Dissection on Survival Rates in Advanced Lower Rectal Car- cinoma[ J ]. Dig Surg, 2007,24 ( 5 ) : 375-381. DOI : 10. 1159/ 000107779.
  • 6van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic ver- sus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR Ⅱ ) : short-term out- comes of a randomised, phase 3 trial[ J ]. Lancet Oncol,2013,14 ( 3 ) :210-218. DOI: 10. 1016/S1470-2045 ( 13 )70016-0.
  • 7Zheng MH, Feng B, Hu CY, et al. Long-term outcome of laparo- scopic total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer [J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2010, 19 ( 6 ) : 329- 339. DOI: 10. 3109/13645706. 2010. 527771.
  • 8Culligan K, Walsh S, Dunne C, et al. The mesocolon: a histolog- ical and electron microscopic characterization of the mesenterie al- tachment of the colon prior to and after surgical mobilization [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2014, 260 ( 6 ) : 1048-1056. DOI: 10. 1097/SLA. 0000000000000323.
  • 9Culligan K, Coffey JC, Kiran RP, et al. The mesocoton: a pro- spective observational study [ J ]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14 ( 4 ) : 421-428. DOI:10. 1111/j. 1463-1318.2012.02935. x.
  • 10Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of lap- aroscopic versus open surgery tor rectal cancer[ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2015,372 (14) : 1324-1332. DOI : 10. 1056/NEJMoaI414882.

共引文献189

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部