期刊文献+

双维度下产品差异化设计与定价研究 被引量:8

Two-dimensional product differentiation and pricing strategies
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究单个制造商在不同渠道中销售产品时面临的产品双维度差异化设计策略选择和定价问题.在考虑横向和纵向双维度的基础上,探讨了制造商三种可能的差异化策略.构建模型证明了在横向和纵向差异化策略下,最优定价策略分别为统一定价和差异化定价.通过对比不同差异化策略发现,当只有单维度差异化策略(即只有横向或纵向差异化中的一种)可供选择时,在一定条件下产品无差异都可能成为最优策略.特别地,在横向差异化策略可供选择条件下,当产品无差异是最优策略时,制造商只选择生产高质量产品;而在纵向差异化情况下结论正好相反,即只选择生产低质量产品.当两个维度的差异化策略同时可供选择时,随着生产成本增大,横向差异化逐渐占优于纵向差异化;当产品横向差异化程度足够大时,无论成本大小,横向差异化都是最优策略.此外,还拓展研究了同时采用横向纵向差异化策略的情况. This paper studies a manufacturer’s two-dimensional product differentiation and pricing strategies when selling products in different channels.On the basis of the horizontal and vertical dimensions,we consider three possible product differentiation strategies.We find that the optimal pricing strategies in the cases of horizontal and vertical differentiation are uniform pricing and differentiated pricing,respectively.The comparisons among differentiation strategies suggest that when only single-dimensional differentiation(i.e.,one horizontal differentiation or one vertical differentiation) is available,product indifference strategy can be the optimal strategy for the manufacturer under some conditions.Specifically,under the condition that only the horizontal differentiation strategy is available,when product indifference strategy is optimal,the manufacturer optimally chooses to produce high-quality products;however,in the case that only the vertical differentiation strategy is available,he chooses to produce only low-quality products.When both horizontal and vertical differentiation are available,with the increase of production cost,the horizontal differentiation gradually dominates the vertical differentiation;however,as long as the level of horizontal differentiation is high enough,regardless of the cost,the horizontal differentiation is always optimal for the manufacturer.Besides,we extend the situation of adopting horizontal and vertical differentiation strategy simult aneously.
作者 上官莉莉 缪朝炜 蓝永泉 SHANGGUAN Lili;MIAO Zhaowei;LAN Yongquan(School of Management,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China)
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第1期93-112,共20页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(71671151,71371158,71711530046) 教育部人文社科项目(14YJC630057)。
关键词 差异化策略 定价策略 产品横向设计 纵向质量水平 differentiation strategy pricing strategy product horizontal design vertical quality level
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献47

  • 1陈宏民.允许后续企业进入的兼并策略及其福利研究[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(1):17-23. 被引量:5
  • 2Chamberlim E H. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition[ M]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1933.
  • 3Hay D A, Morris D J. Industrial Economics and Organization[ M] . Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • 4Hotelling H. Stability in competition[J]. Journal of Economics, 1929, 39: 41--57.
  • 5Salop S, Stiglitz J. Bargains and rip-offs: A model of monopolistically competitive price dispersion[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1977, (44): 493--510.
  • 6Dixit A, Stiglitz J. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity[J]. American Economic Review, 1977, 67: 297--308.
  • 7Spence M. Monopoly quality and regulation[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1975, 6: 417--429.
  • 8d'Aspremont C, Gabszewics J, Thisse J F. On Hotelling's stability in competition[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 17: 1145--1151.
  • 9Gabszewicz J, Shaked A, Sutton J, etc. Price competition among differentiation products: A detailed study of Nash equilibrium. Discussion paper. 81/37, ICERD. London: London School of Economics, 1981.
  • 10Porter M. Competitive Strategy[M]. New York: Free Press, 1980.

共引文献110

同被引文献116

引证文献8

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部