期刊文献+

“张力”的中国古代文论溯源

The origin of"Tension"of in Chinese Classical Literary Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章述议新批评诗学的“张力”论在中国的传播,讨论近些年学界对“张力”与中国文论所做的比较,着重辨析了新批评的“张力”论与中国的“文气”说。认为中国古代文论中的“气”或“气势”不同于“势”,“气”或“气势”并不是“张力”的会通点,真正与新批评的“张力”有相通之处的概念是王夫之所说的“势”。 The article talks about the spread of the"tension"theory of New Criticism Poetics in China,discusses the comparison between"tension"and Chinese literary theory made by academic circles in recent years,and focuses on distinguishing the"tension"theory of New Criticism and Chinese theory of"wenqi".It is believed that the"qi"or"qishi"in ancient Chinese literary theory is different from"shi",and that"qi"or"qishi"is not the meeting point of"tension",and the concept which is really similar to the"tension"of new criticism is what Wang Fu-zhi called"shi".
作者 成盈秋 CHENG Ying-qiu(Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处 《福建教育学院学报》 2021年第1期107-111,125,I0002,共7页 Journal of Fujian Institute of Education
关键词 新批评 张力 隐喻 new criticism tension metaphor qi shi
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部