期刊文献+

能源发展权:从发展权拓殖到能源合作的新思路

The Right to Energy Development:a New Idea from the Colonization of the Right to Development to Energy Cooperation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 二战后为争取民族经济自决权而提出的发展权,经过半个多世纪的发展,尽管在不同阶段的功能属性有所不同,但力求变革国际经济秩序和实现普遍发展的愿景一直存在。当前发展权的发展,在法哲学和人权观总体系中取得重要进展的同时,变革国际经济秩序的功能属性逐渐削弱,以至于在当前国际环境中仅作为一种道德声音。发展权的发展陷入困境。发展权的拓殖成为学理和现实之需。能源发展权的提出,是发展权拓殖的一次尝试。在背景渊源、概念内涵、客观条件以及特别意指方面对能源发展权的建构,使能源发展权转变权利进位的思维转而为能源合作提供思路。 After more than half a century of development,the right to development proposed for the right to self-determination of national economy after World War II,despite the different functional attributes at different stages,the vision of changing the international economic order and realizing universal development has always existed.At present,the development of the right to development has made important progress in the general system of legal philosophy and human rights,while the functional attribute of reforming the international economic order has gradually weakened so that in the current international environment,it is only a moral voice.The development of the right to development is in trouble.The colonization of the right to development has become a theoretical and practical need.The proposal of the right to energy development is an attempt to colonize the right to development.The construction of the right to energy development in the aspects of background,concept,objective conditions and special meaning promotes the transformation of the right to energy development into the right to carry thinking,which provides ideas for energy cooperation.
作者 姜安印 刘博 Jiang Anyin;Liu Bo(Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,Gansu,China)
机构地区 兰州大学
出处 《贵州省党校学报》 2021年第1期64-70,共7页 Journal of Guizhou Provincial Party School
基金 国家社科基金后期资助项目“‘一带一路’倡议的共同发展愿景研究”(项目编号:19FJLB036) 兰州大学重点研究基地建设项目“丝绸之路经济带建设研究”(项目编号:18LZUJBWTD008) 中央高校基本科研项目(项目编号:17LZUJBWZY052)阶段性研究成果。
关键词 发展权 拓殖 能源发展权 能源合作 the right to development colonization the right to energy development energy cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献53

  • 1艾君.森古布达,王燕燕.作为人权的发展[J].经济社会体制比较,2005(1):13-23. 被引量:21
  • 2陈文颖,吴宗鑫,何建坤.全球未来碳排放权“两个趋同”的分配方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):850-853. 被引量:96
  • 3冯颜利.主权与人权解读——从生存权和发展权是首要人权的观点而言[J].政治学研究,2006(3):47-52. 被引量:6
  • 4C. R. Sunstein,"Of Montreal and Kyoto: A Tale of Two Protocols," Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 1(2007), pp. 1 - 65.
  • 5A. M. Halvorssen,"Common, but Differentiated Commitments in the Future Climate Change Regime; Amending the Kyoto Protocol to Include Annex C and the Annex C Mitigation Fund," Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2(2007), pp. 247-265.
  • 6E. A. Posner & C. R.Sunstem," Chmate Change Justice," Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 96(2007 - 2008), pp. 1565- 1612.
  • 7B. A. Green," Lessons from the Montreal Protocol: Guidance for the Next International Climate Change Agreement," Environmental Law, Vol. 39(2009), pp. 253 - 283.
  • 8A. Mumma ~ D. Hodas, Designing a Global Post-Kyoto Climate Change Protocol that Advances Human Development ," Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 4 (2008), pp. 619 - 643.
  • 9A. Sen, Development as Freedom, Oxford.. Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • 10[英]简·汉考克.《环境人权:权力、伦理与法律》,李隼译,重庆:重庆出版社,2007年.

共引文献178

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部