期刊文献+

儿科中药新药临床研究安全性考虑 被引量:7

Safety evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine in pediatric populations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于在儿童人群中开展临床研究的特殊性,目前各监管机构均致力于利用已知数据外推至儿科人群,以减少不必要的临床研究。但外推的原则目前仅限于有效性数据,安全性数据并不适用。中药由于其独特的理论体系、复杂的药物成分及多数情况下不明确的量效关系,使得开展儿科人群临床研究的风险评估需要特殊的考量,对儿科中药品种的安全性评价需贯穿儿科药物研发的始终。本文从临床审评角度,对儿科中药新药研发从立项之初到临床研究及上市后的全生命周期中,如何充分利用已知信息尽可能地识别潜在的安全性风险,有针对性地进行观察、评价和监测的相关考虑进行了详细阐述;并对当前监管环境下如何权衡儿童临床研究的风险和获益,以推动儿科中药的研发提出了思考,以期为儿科中药研发提供参考。 Along with the development of pediatric drugs,drug administration agencies are commit⁃ted to extrapolating known data to the pediatric population in order to reduce unnecessary clinical studies.However,the principle of extrapolation is limited to efficacy,and safety analysis currently does not apply.Because of its unique theoretical system,complex drug ingredients and unclear dose-response relationship in most cases,traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)requires special consideration in the risk assessment of pediatric clinical studies.Safety assessment of pediatric varieties of traditional Chinese medicine should run through the development of pediatric drugs.From the perspective of clinical review,this paper was intended to elaborate how to make full use of the known information to identify potential safety risks,observe the right things and to evaluate and monitor safety issues in the whole life cycle of drug development for pediatric TCM products.Furthermore,some suggestions were raised on how to balance the risks and benefits of clinical research for children in the current regulatory environment in order to promote the research and development of TCM products for pediatric populations.
作者 杨娜 韩玲 YANG Na;HAN Ling(Center for Drug Evaluation,National Medical Products Administration,Beijing 100038,China)
出处 《中国药理学与毒理学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第11期811-816,共6页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology
关键词 儿科人群 中药 新药 临床研究 安全性评价 风险获益评估 药品监管 pediatric population traditional Chinese medicine new drugs clinical research safety evaluation risk benefit evaluation drug regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献109

共引文献128

同被引文献113

引证文献7

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部