期刊文献+

知识产权惩罚性赔偿与法定赔偿的协调适用 被引量:20

Coordinated Application of Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement and Legal Compensation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 知识产权惩罚性赔偿与法定赔偿原本各司其职,前者侧重惩罚侵权、预防再犯,后者意在填平损失、兜底救济。然而实践中,法定赔偿适用泛化使得数量计算规则适用较难,间接影响惩罚性赔偿获取计算基数。为解决这一问题,可以适当划分惩罚性赔偿与法定赔偿的适用领域,合理限制法定赔偿的适用空间并剔除其间掺杂的惩罚性因素。与此同时,还可适度降低数量计算规则中的高精度期待,变通实际损失、侵权获利、许可费倍数的适用顺序要求,灵活叠加数量计算规则与法定赔偿所得结果作为总判赔额。由此,促成惩罚性赔偿有效落实、法定赔偿规范适用。 Intellectual property punitive damages and legal compensation originally performed their own duties.The former focuses on punishing infringements and preventing recidivism,while the latter is intended to fill losses and provide relief.However,in practice,the generalization of the application of Legal Compensationmakes it difficult to apply the quantity calculation rules,which indirectly affects the calculation base of punitive damages.In order to solve this problem,the applicable fields of punitive damages and legal compensation can be divided appropriately,and the applicable space of statutory damages can be reasonably limited and the punitive factors mixed in legal compensation can be removed.At the same time,it can also moderately reduce the high-precision expectation in the quantity calculation rules,change the application order of actual losses,infringement profits,and license fee multiples,and flexibly add the result of the quantity calculation rules and legal compensation as the total award.Finally,the effective application of punitive damages and statutory damages can be promoted.
作者 刘军华 叶明鑫 Liu Junhua;Ye Mingxing
出处 《中国应用法学》 CSSCI 2021年第1期115-131,共17页 China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
基金 2019年度最高人民法院司法研究重大课题“知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度研究” 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“品牌强国战略的制度保障研究”(19JJD820006)的研究成果。
关键词 知识产权 惩罚性赔偿 法定赔偿 协调适用 intellectual property punitive damages legal compensation coordinative application
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献357

同被引文献178

引证文献20

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部