期刊文献+

小学数学教学中的表现性评价及其应用 被引量:24

Performance Assessment and Application in Primary Mathematics Teaching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 构建科学合理的评价方式,通过评价更好地了解学生的学习,并以评价改进教学,成为近来教育教学中非常值得关注的话题。表现性评价运用于小学数学教学中,能更好地了解学生的数学理解水平并有效改进教学。以“两位数减一位数退位减法”为例,制定了算理理解的水平框架并设计了表现性任务,对学生的算理理解水平和学习过程进行了测评。最后,合理应用表现性评价框架及测评,有针对性地进行了教学设计,有效促进了学生对算理的理解水平。 Creating scientific and appropriate assessment approaches to better understand students5 learning and promote mstruction has become a topic of great value tn the field of education recently.The application of performance assessment to the mstruction of primary mathematics can provide a better viewof students,levels ofmathematical understandingand tmprove kistruction.Taking“subtractionwith regrouping n 2-digtt number minus 1-digt number”as an example,this paper develops the level framework of arithmetic understanding with performance tasks to assess students5 understanding and learning process.With the performance assessment framework,a targeted instruction is designed to effectively promote students5 arithmetic understanding.
作者 章勤琼 阳海林 陈肖颖 Zhang Qinqiong;Yang Hailin;Chen Xiaoying(College of Education,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou Zhejiang 325035,China;Songshanhu No.1 Primary School,Dongguan Guangdong 523808,China;Department of Mathematics Education,Chonnam National University,Gzvangju 61186,Korea)
出处 《课程.教材.教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期83-89,共7页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基金 2020年国家社科基金一般项目“大数据支持下的中小学合作型课堂组织形式建构研究”(20BGL127) 浙江省高等教育“十三五”第二批教学改革研究项目“师范类专业认证背景下的《名师大讲堂》课程改革与实践研究”(jg20190403)。
关键词 表现性评价 水平框架 退位减法 算理理解 performance assessment level framework subtraction with regrouping arithmetic understanding
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献30

  • 1Biggs,J.B,& Collis,K.F..Evaluating the Quality of Learning:the SOLO Taxonomy.New York:Academic Press.1982.
  • 2Biggs,J.B,& Collis,K.F,.Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behaviour.In H.Rowe(Ed.),Intelligence,Reconceptualization and Measurement.New Jersey:Laurence Erlbaurn Assoc.1991,pp.57-76.
  • 3Pegg,J..Assessing students' understanding at the primary and secondary level in the mathematical sciences.In J.Izard & M.Stephens(Eds),Reshaping Assessment Practice:Assessment in the Mathematical Sciences Under Challenge.Melbourne:Australian Council of Educational Research.1992,pp.368-385.
  • 4Pegg,J.& Davey,G..Interpreting Student Understanding in Geometry:A synthesis of Two Models.In R.Lehrer & C.Chazan,(Eds),Designing Learning Environments for Developing Understanding of Geometry and Space.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum.1998,pp.109-135.
  • 5Case,R..The Mind' s Staircase:Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children' s thought and knowledge.New Jersey:Laurence Erlbaum Assoc.1992.
  • 6Fischer,K.W.& Knight,C.C..Cognitive development in real children:Levels and variations.In B.Presseisen(Ed.),Learning and thinking styles:Classroom interaction.Washington:National Education Association.1990,pp.43-67.
  • 7Anderson,K.R..Cognitive psychology and its implications.San Francisco:Freeman.1980.
  • 8Campbell,K,Watson,J.& Collis,K..Volume measurement and intellectual development.Journal of-Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems,11,1992,pp279-298.
  • 9Panizzon,D.L..Senior secondary and early tertiary science students' developmental understandings of diffusion and osmosis:A neo-Piagetian approach.Unpublished thesis for the degree of PhD,University of New England,Armidale,Australia.1999.
  • 10Chick,H.Cognition in the formal modes:research mathematics and the SOLO taxonomy,Mathematics Education Research Journal.1998,Vol.10(2),pp.4-26.

同被引文献96

引证文献24

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部