摘要
20世纪70年代以来,越南公布的官方文件、越南学术界一些学者发表的论著抛出了所谓“黄沙”“长沙”问题,试图寻找各种“历史证据”,将“黄沙”“长沙”与南海中的我国西沙群岛、南沙群岛相混淆,指鹿为马,张冠李戴,为其对我国西沙、南沙两群岛的主权声索提供学理支撑。针对越南制造的“黄沙”“长沙”问题,我国学者发掘中国的史籍文献、越南的有限记载和西方其他相关的各种史料,反驳越南官方文件的观点和“历史典据”,剖析越南学术界一些学者提出的论点和论据,从多种视角与分析方法展开深入研究,考证出越南史籍中零星记载的所谓“黄沙”“长沙”是指越南中部至南部近海海域的一些岛屿和沙洲,有力地驳斥了越南关于“黄沙”“长沙”的非理和非法主张,为捍卫我国南海岛礁主权和海洋权益作出了积极的贡献。
Since the 1970s,Vietnamese authorities and academic circles have been searching for“historical evidence”to provide theoretical support for their claims to China's Xisha Islands and Nansha Islands.They have put forward the so⁃called“Hoàng Sa”and“Truong Sa”issues in the official documents and academic literature.Chinese scholars have explored various historical materials to refute their viewpoints and“histori⁃cal evidence”,and made an in⁃depth research from different perspectives and in many analytical methods.They found out that the so⁃called“Hoàng Sa”and“Truong Sa”recorded sporadically in Vietnamese histori⁃cal documents were some islands and shoals in the offshore sea areas from central to southern Vietnam about dozens of kilometers away,which forcefully refuted Vietnam's irrational and illegal claims.Their findings have made a positive contribution to defending our sovereignty and maritime rights in the South China Sea.
作者
于向东
徐成志
YU Xiangdong;XU Chengzhi(Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出处
《太平洋学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第2期58-70,共13页
Pacific Journal
基金
2017年教育部国别和区域研究项目“中国与越南关系研究——以近年海上争端与合作为例”的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
“黄沙”“长沙”问题
西沙群岛、南沙群岛主权
历史依据
中越关系
“Hoàng Sa”and“Truong Sa”issues
sovereignty over Xisha Islands and Nansha Islands
his⁃torical evidence
Sino⁃Vietnam relations