学术代表作时间周期、首发载体及题材类型特征研究——以图灵奖为例

Research on Time Cycle,First Carrier and Research Type of Academic Representative Works:A Case Study of Turing Award

[目的/意义]代表作在学术评价中的全面推行是科研管理工作的关注热点。其规律性研究有助于推进代表作评价的理论构建,为国家科研评价改革提供决策参考。[研究设计/方法]选取图灵奖得主代表作为研究对象,基于文献计量和非参数检验方法,分析图灵奖代表作时间周期、首发载体及题材类型等的特征规律。[结论/发现]①随时间推移,代表作从发布到被图灵奖认可所需时间存在逐渐上升的整体趋势。②不同首发载体的代表作完成年龄和被认可所需时间可能会存在一定差异,在会议类和发明类代表作中尤为显著。③部分代表作的题材类型对代表作的完成年龄和被认可所需时间具有相对显著影响。[创新/价值]以图灵奖为切入点,分析获奖者学术代表作特征,为相关学术评价制度的设立提供参考和借鉴。

[Purpose/Significance]The implementation of representative work evaluation is one of the critical issues of research evaluation reform currently in China.The empirical study can help improve the theoretical construction of representative work evaluation,and provide decision-making reference for research policy reform.[Design/Methodology]Based on bibliometrics approach and non-parametric test,we analyzed the characteristics of representative works of Turing prize-winners from the following perspectives:time cycle,first carrier and type of research.[Findings/Conclusion]Firstly,there is a trend of timeconsuming increasement between the release of representative work and the recognition by the Turing Award.Secondly,representative works of different carriers vary in the time of completion and recognition,particularly for the conference papers and inventions.Thirdly,for some representative works,the types of research have a relatively significant impact on authors’age of completion and the time required to be recognized.[Originality/Value]We took Turing Award as an empirical case and analyzed the characteristics of the prize winners’academic representative works.The results could contribute to the design and implementation of representative work evaluation system.