血常规检验中不同采血方法的应用效果分析

Analysis of practical effect of different blood collection methods in blood routine test

目的探讨血常规检验中应用不同采血方法的效果。方法 130例接受血常规检验的受检者,随机分为参照组和研究组,各65例。参照组应用末梢采血方式进行检验,研究组应用静脉采血方式进行检验。比较两组受检者的检验结果。结果研究组白细胞、红细胞、血红蛋白、红细胞比容、血小板以及平均红细胞血红蛋白浓度分别为(5.89±0.98)×10^(9)/L、(4.16±0.69)×10^(12)/L、(13.57±8.03)g/L、(0.47±0.05)%、(228.73±34.72)×10^(9)/L、(311.82±18.26)g/L,明显优于参照组的(7.29±1.00)×10^(9)/L、(3.93±0.51)×10^(12)/L、(10.71±8.01)g/L、(0.40±0.03)%、(210.43±30.19)×10^(9)/L、(304.16±15.19)g/L,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相对于末梢采血方式,在血常规检验中应用静脉采血方式其检验数据更为精准,可为临床诊断提供给科学、可靠的参考依据,值得在临床中大力推广。

Objective To discuss the effect of different blood collection methods in blood routine test.Methods A total of 130 subjects undergoing routine blood tests were randomly divided into reference group and research group,with 65 cases in each group.The reference group was tested by peripheral blood collection,and the research group was tested by venous blood collection.The test results of the two groups were compared.Results The white blood cell,red blood cell,hemoglobin,hematocrit,platelet and average red blood cell hemoglobin concentration of the research group were(5.89±0.98)×10^(9)/L,(4.16±0.69)×10^(12)/L,(13.57±8.03)g/L,(0.47±0.05)%,(228.73±34.72)×10^(9)/L and(311.82±18.26)g/L,which were obviously better than(7.29±1.00)×10^(9)/L,(3.93±0.51)×10^(12)/L,(10.71±8.01)g/L,(0.40±0.03)%,(210.43±30.19)×10^(9)/L and(304.16±15.19)g/L of the reference group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with peripheral blood collection,the application of venous blood collection in routine blood tests has more accurate test data,which can provide scientific and reliable reference for clinical diagnosis and is worthy of promotion in the clinic.