期刊文献+

西尼地平对高血压患者蛋白尿水平及血压影响的Meta分析

Effects of Cilnidipine on blood pressure and proteinuria level in hypertensive patients:a Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统比较L/N型钙通道阻滞剂西尼地平与L型钙通道阻滞剂(L-CCB)对高血压患者蛋白尿水平和血压的影响。方法检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网及万方数据库,收集从建库至2019年12月24日发表的以西尼地平为治疗措施,L-CCB为对照措施,高血压患者为研究对象的随机对照试验,依据Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具进行质量评价,采用RvMan 5.3进行Meta分析,Stata 12进行偏倚分析和敏感性分析。结果共纳入13篇文献,14项研究。Meta分析显示:西尼地平在血压控制方面与L-CCB不存在差异,在减少蛋白尿(尿白蛋白/肌酐>30 mg/g)方面明显优于L-CCB(SMD=-0.31,95%CI:-0.41~-0.20,P<0.0001),基线蛋白尿水平是主要的异质性来源。当按蛋白尿产生原因分析时,西尼地平对糖尿病引起的大量蛋白尿(尿白蛋白/肌酐>300 mg/g)的降低作用优于L-CCB(SMD=-0.74,95%CI:-1.38~-0.11,P=0.02),在微量蛋白尿(尿白蛋白/肌酐:30~300 mg/g)降低方面无明显差异(SMD=-0.12,95%CI:-0.38~0.14,P=0.37)。结论西尼地平在保持降压作用的同时,在降蛋白尿方面较L-CCB有优势,但其更倾向于降低高血压或慢性肾脏病引起的蛋白尿,而对糖尿病引起蛋白尿的降低作用还需要进一步研究。 Objective This study was designed to systematically evaluate the effects of L/N type calcium channel blocker Cilnidipine and L type calcium channel blocker on proteinuria and blood pressure in hypertensive patients.Methods PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI and WanFang database were searched from the date of databases'establishment to December 24,2019,included the randomized controlled trials base on the criteria of using Cilnidipine as the treatment drug and L-type calcium channel blockers(L-CCB)as the control drug in hypertensive patients.The qualities of the literatures were evaluated following Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools.RevMan 5.3 was used for Meta-analysis.Stata 12 was used for bias analysis and sensitivity analysis.Results A total of 13 literatures and 14 studies were included.Meta-analysis showed that there was no difference between Cilnidipine and L-CCB in blood pressure control,and it was significantly better than L-CCB in reducing proteinuria(urinary albumin/creatinine>30 mg/g)(SMD=-0.31,95%CI:-0.41~-0.20,P<0.0001).Baseline proteinuria levels were the main source of heterogeneity.When analyzed according to the source of proteinuria,the effect of Cilnidipine on the reduction of macroproteinuria(urinary albumin/creatinine>300 mg/g)caused by diabetes was better than LCCB(SMD=-0.74,95%CI:-1.38~-0.11,P=0.02),and there was no significant difference in the reduction of microproteinuria(urinary albumin/creatinine:30~300 mg/g)(SMD=-0.12,95%CI:-0.38~0.14,P=0.37).Conclusion While maintaining the anti-hypertension effect,Cilnidipine has an advantage over L-CCB in lowering proteinuria,but it tends to reduce proteinuria caused by hypertension or primary renal disease,and its protective effect on proteinuria caused by diabetes still needs further study.
作者 曹建成 郭璐 柳元化 CAO Jian-cheng;GUO Lu;LIU Yuan-hua(Department of Cardiology,Huzhou First People's Hospital,Zhejiang Huzhou 313000,China;Department of Pharmacy,Huzhou First People's Hospital,Zhejiang Huzhou 313000,China)
出处 《临床药物治疗杂志》 2021年第2期63-69,共7页 Clinical Medication Journal
基金 湖州市科学技术局项目——探究心型脂肪酸结合蛋白在急性心肌梗死1小时快速分诊中的应用价值(2019GY12)。
关键词 西尼地平 蛋白尿 血压 随机对照试验 META分析 Cilnidipine proteinuria blood pressure randomized controlled trial Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Shiga T, Yamada Y, Matsuda N, et al. Influence of cilnidipine or nisoldipine on sympathetic activity in healthy male subjects. Heart Vessels,2007,22 ( 3 ) :404-409.
  • 2Nagahama S, Norimatsu T, Maki T, et al. The Effect of Combination Therapy with an L/NType Ca^2 + Channel Blocker, Cilnidipine, and an Angiotensin Ⅱ Receptor Blocker on the Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Japanese Hypertensive Patients: An Observational Study Conducted in Japan. Hypertens Res,2007,30(7) :815-822.
  • 3Amann K, Rump LC, Simonaviciene A, et al. Elects of low dose sympathetic inhibition on glomerulosclerosis and lbuminuria in subtotally nephrectomized rats.J Am Soc Nephrol,2000, 11 (10) : 1469-1478.
  • 4Grassi G, Seravalle G, Tutti C, et al. Short-versus long-term effects of different dihydropyridines on sympathetic and baroreflex function in hypertension. Hypertension ,2003,41 (5) :558-562.
  • 5Fujita T, Ando K, Nishimura H, et al. Antiproteinuric effect of the calcium channel blocker cilnidipine added to renin-angiotensin inhibition in hypertensive patients with chronic renal disease. Kidney Int,2007,72 ( 8 ) : 1543-1549.
  • 6Kojima S, Shida M, Yokoyama H. Comparison between cilnidipine and amlodipine besilate with respect to proteinuria in hypertensive patients with renal diseases. Hypertens Res, 2004,27 ( 2 ) : 379- 385.
  • 7Fujisawa T, Ikegami H, Noso S, et al. Renoprotective effect of N- type Ca channel blockade in diabetic nephropathy. J Diabetes Complications ,2007,21 (2) :252-257.
  • 8Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens, 2007,25 ( 5 ) : 1105 -1187.
  • 9Bakris GL, Copley JB, Vicknair N, et al. Calcium channel blockers versus other antihypertensive therapies on progression of NIDDM associated nephropathy. Kidney Int, 1996,50 ( 10 ) : 1641-1650.
  • 10Gashti CN, Bakris GL. The role of calcium antagonists in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens,2004,13 ( 1 ) : 155- 161.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部