期刊文献+

体质量指数对宫颈癌调强放疗摆位误差影响 被引量:13

Effect of body mass index on setup errors in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈癌患者体质量指数(BMI)对调强放疗摆位误差的影响,以及在不考虑旋转误差、靶区及邻近器官变化的情况下不同BMI宫颈癌患者放疗的最佳体位。方法将90例宫颈癌患者根据BMI分为过轻组(BMI≤18.4kg/m^(2))、正常组(18.5kg/m^(2)≤BMI≤23.9kg/m^(2))和超重组(BMI≥24kg/m^(2)),每组各30例。每组内又分为仰卧位(15例)和俯卧位(15例)两种体位固定方式。获取90例宫颈癌患者共2250组CBCT数据,记录并分析每组内摆位误差大小,并根据公式MPTV=2.5Σ+0.7σ计算最佳体位靶区外扩边界值。结果不考虑BMI分组情况下,仰卧位和俯卧位在x、y、z轴向的摆位误差差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。考虑BMI情况下,过轻组中仰卧位在x、y轴向的摆位误差小于俯卧位(P<0.05),但z轴向的摆位误差无统计学差异(P>0.05),其对应的仰卧位MPTV为4.76、4.27、5.73mm;正常组中仰卧位和俯卧位x、y轴向的摆位误差差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但z轴向的摆位误差俯卧位小于仰卧位,其对应的俯卧位MPTV为6.42、10.21、4.91mm;超重组中仰卧位和俯卧位在x、z轴向的摆位误差差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但y轴向的摆位误差俯卧位小于仰卧位,其对应的俯卧位MPTV为5.88、5.26、5.32mm。结论不考虑旋转误差、靶区及邻近器官变化情况下,BMI≤18.4时固定方式选择仰卧位较好,BMI≥18.5时固定方式选择俯卧位较合适。 Objective To investigate the effect of body mass index(BMI)on setup errors in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer and explore the optimal position for patients with different BMI without taking into account the rotation error and the changes in target area and adjacent organs.Methods A total of 90 patients were divided into three groups according to their BMI:light weight group(BMI≤18.4 kg/m^(2)),normal weight group(18.5 kg/m^(2)≤BMI≤23.9 kg/m^(2))and overweight group(BMI≥24 kg/m^(2)).Thirty patients were assigned into each group including15 patients in the supine position and 15 patients in the prone position.In total,2250 sets of CBCT scan data of 90 patients were obtained.The setup errors were recorded and analyzed in each group.The margins of the optimal position were calculated according to the formula of MPTV=2.5+0.7.Results When BMI was not taken into account,there was no significant difference in the setup errors between the supine and prone positions in the x,y and z directions(all P>0.05).When BMI was considered,the setup error in the supine position were significantly smaller than those in the prone position in the x and y directions in the light weight group,whereas there was no significant difference in the setup errors between the supine and prone positions in the z direction(P>0.05).The corresponding MPTV in the supine position was 4.76,4.27 and 5.73mm,respectively.In the normal weight group,there was no significant difference in the setup errors between the supine and prone positions in the x and y directions(both P>0.05),whereas the setup error in the prone position was smaller than that in the supine position in the z direction.The corresponding MPTV in the prone position were 6.42,10.21 and 4.91mm,respectively.In the overweight group,there was no significant difference in the setup errors between the supine and prone positions in the x and z directions(all P>0.05),whereas the setup error in the prone position was smaller than that in the supine position in the y direction.The corresponding MPTV in the prone position were 5.88,5.26 and 5.32mm,respectively.Conclusions Without taking into account the rotation error and the changes in target area and adjacent organs,when the BMI≤18.4,the supine position is recommended.When the BMI≥18.5,it is better to choose the prone position.
作者 李雅宁 林承光 杨鑫 Li Yaning;Lin Chengguang;Yang Xin(State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine,Department of Radiation Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Guangzhou 510060,China)
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第2期186-190,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基金 广州市珠江科技新星专项资助(201710010162) 广东省自然科学基金(2017A030310217) 广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2020516)。
关键词 宫颈癌/调强放射疗法 体质量指数 摆位误差 Cervical cancer/intensity-modulated radiotherapy Body mass index Setup error
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献55

  • 1张雪哲,曲凤宏.CT导引下胸部经皮细针穿刺活检的临床应用[J].中华放射学杂志,1989,23(1):47-48. 被引量:86
  • 2刘跃平,刘新帆,李晔雄,关莹.膀胱充盈状态对前列腺癌三维适形放疗靶区和重要器官的影响[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(1):48-51. 被引量:19
  • 3于龙珍,翟振宇,沈君姝.体部肿瘤精确放疗摆位误差分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2007,24(3):160-162. 被引量:36
  • 4Herbert SH, Solin LJ, Hoffman JP, et al. Volumetric analysis of small bowel displacement from radiation portals with the use of a pelvic tissue expander. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1993, 25(5) : 885-893.
  • 5Baglan KL, Frazier RC, Yah D, et al. The dose-volume relationship of acute small bowel toxicity from concurrent 5-FU-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Plays, 2002, 52 ( 1 ) : 176-183.
  • 6Nuyttens JJ, Robertson JM, Yan D, et al. The influence of small bowel motion on both a conventional three-field and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for rectal cancer. Cancer Radiother, 2004, 8(5): 297-304.
  • 7Stroom JC, Koper PCM, Korevaar GA, et al. Internal organ motion in prostate cancer patients treated in prone and supine treatment position. Radiother Oncol, 1999, 51 (3) : 237-248.
  • 8Tinger A, Michalski JM, Cheng A, et al. A critical evaluation of the planning target volume for 3-D conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1998, 42(1):213-221.
  • 9Lebesque JV, Bruce AM, Kroes APG, et al. Variation in volumes, dose-volume histograms, and estimated normal tissue complication probabilities of rectum and bladder during conformal radiotherapy of T3 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1995, 33(5): 1109-1119.
  • 10简江涛,冯焕清.医学图像分割中的形变模型技术[J].国际生物医学工程杂志,2007,30(4):222-226. 被引量:3

共引文献113

同被引文献116

引证文献13

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部