国际投资仲裁证据适用问题研究

Research on the Application of Evidence in International Investment Arbitration

国际投资仲裁在证据证明问题上融合多个国家的证据理论及标准,以其所谓“个案分析”实现不同国家不同投资协议主体的争端解决,然而在此过程中存在诸如仲裁证据的采信标准不一、仲裁过程保密等问题,从而引发仲裁正当性危机,使其裁决结果的认可度和可信度存疑。鉴于此,尝试厘清仲裁庭对证据的审查采信标准,在申请仲裁和仲裁审理时的证据证明标准,在特殊情况下的举证责任分配和转移,明确即使是不同法系不同国家法律也能通用的一般证据原则。仲裁庭应允许第三方参与举证使得仲裁过程公开化,在仲裁裁决中对证据采信与事实认定进行充分说理使得仲裁文书公开化,以适应国际投资仲裁透明度改革的大趋势。

International investment arbitration on evidence to prove that the evidence fusion multiple countries,with its so-called“case analysis”to implement different country different investment agreement dispute settlement body,yet in the process the adoption standard of evidence such as arbitration,the arbitration process secret,causing the arbitration legitimacy crisis,its ruling the recognition of possible doubt.Because of this the paper attempts to clarify the standards for the review and admissibility of evidence by the arbitral tribunal,the standards for evidence proof in the application for arbitration and arbitration hearing,the distribution and transfer of burden of proof under special circumstances,and the principles of evidence that can be used in different legal systems and laws of different countries.In order to adapt to the general trend of transparency reform in international investment arbitration,the arbitral tribunal should make the arbitration process open by allowing the third party to participate in the production of evidence,and make the arbitration documents open by fully explaining the evidence acceptance and fact finding in the arbitration award.