期刊文献+

认罪认罚案件被害人的权利保障问题研究——以《关于适用认罪认罚从宽制度的指导意见》为视角

Research on the Protection of the Victims'Rights in the Case of Admission of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment——With The Guidance on the Application of the Lenient System of Admission of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 虽然认罪认罚从宽制度的初衷在于优化诉讼资源配置及保障被追诉人合法权利,但也不应忽视被害人权益的保护。《指导意见》的颁布,为实践中认罪认罚案件被害人权利保障问题指明了方向,但仍然存在听取意见的有效性、和解谅解的自愿性、量刑建议的参与性、被害人救助的现实性无法保障的问题。未来仍应在赋予被害人知情权、值班律师帮助权、强化被害人和解自愿性的审查、提升被害人量刑建议的参与度、构建刑事被害人救助体系方面作出努力。 Although the original intention of leniency system is to optimize the allocation of litigation resources and protect the legitimate rights of the accused,the protection of the rights and interests of the victims should not be ignored.The promulgation of the Guidance on the Application of the Lenient System of Admission of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment points out the direction for the protection of the victims'rights in cases of admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment in practice.however,there are still some problems,such as the effectiveness of listening to opinions,the voluntary understanding of reconciliation,the participation of sentencing suggestions,and the unprotectability of victim assistance reality.In the future,efforts should still be made to give the victim the right to know,the right of help of the duty lawyer,strengthened examination of the victim's voluntary reconciliation,enhanced participation of the victim's sentencing suggestions,and construction of the assistance system for criminal victims.
作者 方彬彬 郭航 FANG Bin-bin;GUO Hang(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China;Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2020年第6期22-29,共8页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
基金 西南政法大学2019年度校级科研项目“被追诉人值班律师会见权实施程序研究”(项目编号:2019XZQN-03) 西南政法大学法学院2020年度研究生科研创新项目“认罪认罚案件被害人权利保障机制研究”(项目编号:FXY2020098)。
关键词 认罪认罚 被害人 有效参与 听取意见 admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment victim effective participation listening to opinions
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献101

  • 1谢小剑.美国辩诉交易中的被害人权利保护[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2008(3):144-149. 被引量:4
  • 2陈国庆.试论构建中国式的认罪协商制度[J].环球法律评论,2006,28(5):541-545. 被引量:37
  • 3[德]卡尔.恩吉施.《法律思维导论》,郑永流译,法律出版社2004年版,第52页.
  • 4宋英辉译.《刑事程序中保护被害人等附带措施的法律》附录,载樊崇义主编.《诉讼法学研究》(第三卷),北京:中国检察出版社2002年版,第450-452页.
  • 5South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989).
  • 6Lois Haight Herrington et. al. , "President's Task Force on Victims of Crimes" Final Report, December 1982, p. 72, http://www, ojp. usdoj, gov/ovc/publications/presdntstskforcrprt/front, pdf.
  • 7Edna Erez, "Victim Impact Statement," Australian Institute of Criminology, ed. , Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, No. 33, September 1991 , p. 3, http://www, aic. gov. au/publications/tandi/ti33, pdf.
  • 8"Victim' s Personal Statement Policy," Section 4.2 - 4.3 , Version 1.3, Dorset Police 2005, http ://www. dorset, police. uk/pdf/P15 - 2001Victims_Personal_Statement_ProcedureV1 5. pdf.
  • 9Fiona Leverick, James Chalmers and Peter Duff, "An Evaluation of the Pilot Victim Statement Schemes in Scotland," Scotland Executive Social Research, 2007, pp. 16 - 17, http ://www. scotland, gov. uk/Resource/Doc/173083/0048280, pdf.
  • 10Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, § 32(i) (g) (B).

共引文献522

相关主题

;
使用帮助 返回顶部