新时代我国科研评价体系重构中必须处理好八大关系

Eight Relationships in the Reconstruction of Scientific Research Evaluation System in China in the New Era

没有科学的评价就没有科学的管理。目前,我国科研评价体系一定程度上存在着"SCI至上化"、量化考核泛化、同行评审形式化、评价导向行政化、学术研究功利化等评价失衡问题。在破除"SCI至上"等科研评价顽疾背景下,科研评价体系重构是适应新时代我国科研管理和科技创新发展的迫切需要。重构科研评价体系必须正确处理好八大辩证关系:管理评价与学术评价的关系、定量评价与定性评价的关系、工具性与目的性的关系、分类评价与统一评价的关系、评价理论与评价实践的关系、数量与质量的关系、论文评价与评价的关系、元评价与评价的关系。这些思考有助于更加理性、辩证地认识科研评价存在的问题,从而更全面地把握科研评价的科学内涵、要素、原则、作用,以便更好地指导科研评价实践活动。建议运用评价学理论指导科研评价实践,区分管理评价与学术评价,坚持分类导向、综合导向、质量导向,围绕评价目的合理使用论文指标以开展科学评价,重构科学合理的、适应新时代要求的科研评价体系。图3。表2。参考文献31。

Without scientific evaluation there is no scientific management.At present our country’s scientific research evaluation system has various issues such as"SCI First"peer review formalization simplification of quantitative assessment evaluation-oriented administration and academic research utilitarianization.In the background of eliminating the stubborn problems of scientific research evaluation such as"SCI First"the reconstruction of the scientific research evaluation system is an urgent need to be adapted in order to meet the development of scientific research management and technological innovation in China in this new era.To reconstruct the scientific research evaluation system eight dialectical relationships must be correctly handled 1 the relationship between management evaluation and academic evaluation 2 the relationship between quantitative evaluation and qualitative evaluation 3 the relationship between instrumentality and purpose 4 the relationship between classified evaluation and unified evaluation 5 the relationship between evaluation theory and evaluation practice 6 the relationship between quantity and quality 7 the relationship between paper evaluation and evaluation 8 the relationship between meta-evaluation and evaluation.These rational thinking can promote a more rational and dialectical understanding of the current problems existing in scientific research evaluation which can lead to more fully grasp the scientific connotation elements principles and functions of scientific research evaluation so as to better guide the practical activities of scientific research evaluation.We suggest using evaluation theory to guide the practice of scientific research evaluation distinguishing management evaluation from academic evaluation insisting on classification-oriented comprehensive-oriented and quality-oriented evaluation with the purpose of evaluation using paper indicators reasonably to implement scientific evaluation reconstructing the scientific research evaluation system which is not only scientific and reasonable but also meets the new era’s requirements.3 figs.2 tabs.31 refs.