乡村文化治理的创新机制——控制权共享机制

The Innovative Mechanism of Rural Cultural Governance——The Mechanism of Shared Control Rights

新时代乡村文化治理亟需安排一个创新机制,以勾连三大纵横治理逻辑,破解乡村文化治理的悬浮化困境。在乡村调研基础上,根据控制权理论提出控制权共享制作为勾连三大纵横治理逻辑的创新机制,通过一个整合性理论框架和多案例比较分析解读控制权共享制,并总结其规律性特征。研究结果表明:(1)控制权共享制,是由乡镇政府让渡部分乡村文化控制权给文化能人、新乡贤等控制权代理人,由乡镇政府与控制权代理人共享乡村文化控制权力的创新机制。(2)整合性理论框架分析显示,控制权共享制产生的根源是乡村文化治理的扁平化结构,其形成了"乡镇政府+控制权代理人"的形式,纵向勾通行政发包制、项目制和乡村社会的联系,横向连接各类功能性组织以形成乡村文化治理分类控制体系,且在乡村实践中具有四种外在形式。(3)多案例比较分析显示,控制权共享制有利于破解乡村文化悬浮化困境,其内在特征呈现"中心—外围"规律,但存在共享深度不够、合法性存疑的问题。(4)从扩大共享深度、提高规范性两方面提出了保障对策。

It is urgent that rural cultural governance needs to be arranged an innovative mechanism to link the three vertical and horizontal governance logics to solve the suspension of rural cultural resources in the new era. The mechanism of shared control rights is proposed as the innovative mechanism of three vertical and horizontal governance logics based on rural investigation and the control power theory, and then it is interpreted and analyzed through an integrated theoretical framework and multiple cases, on which its regular characteristics are summarized.The results are:(1) The mechanism of shared control rights is an innovative mechanism in which the township government and the control agents share the control power of rural culture, after the township government transfers part of the control of rural culture to cultural talents,Xinxiangxian and other control agents.(2) The analysis of an integrated theoretical framework shows that: caused by the flat structure of rural cultural governance, the mechanism of shared control rights vertically links the administrative contracting and project systems with the rural society, also it horizontally connect various functional organizations to form a rural cultural governance classification control system by forming the structural fulcrum of the " control agent of the township government";and it has four external forms in rural practice.(3) Comparative analysis of multiple cases shows that the mechanism of shared control rights is helpful to solve the dilemma of the suspension of rural culture. Its internal characteristics present the "center-periphery" rule, but there are problems such as insufficient sharing depth and questionable legitimacy.(4) Countermeasures in terms of expanding the sharing depth and improving the standardization are proposed at last.