期刊文献+

工作设计要素对工程项目团队的影响——一个组态效应视角的研究

Impact of Work Design Factors on Engineering Project Team:A Research of Configuration Effect Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于系统观组态理论视角,文章旨在揭示项目团队心理授权不是依赖于工作设计某种单一要素影响,而是依赖于不同影响因素之间的交互作用。为此,以206位工程项目团队成员为研究对象,运用定性比较分析方法探究工作设计的不同条件要素组合对团队心理授权的影响路径。研究表明,存在3条典型路径对团队心理授权产生正向影响。本文研究结果为工程项目团队心理授权相关研究提供多维研究视角,拓展了定性比较分析方法在工程实践领域的应用。 Based on the system view configuration theory perspective,the article aims to reveal that the psychological empowerment of the project team does not depend on the influence of a single element of the work design,but on the interaction between different influencing factors.To this end,206 engineering project team members are taken as the research objects,and the qualitative comparative analysis method is used to explore the influence path of different combination of conditions and elements of work design on team psychological empowerment.Research shows that there are three typical paths that have a positive impact on team mental empowerment.The research results of this paper provide a multi-dimensional research perspective for the research on psychological empowerment of engineering project teams,and expand the application of qualitative comparative analysis methods in the field of engineering practice.
作者 孙春玲 张文静 李芷莹 SUN Chun-ling;ZHANG Wen-jing;LI Zhi-ying(School of Management,Tianjin University of Technology,Tianjin 300384,China)
出处 《价值工程》 2021年第2期38-41,共4页 Value Engineering
基金 2019年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金:“工程项目团队心理授权组态识别、动态调控研究”(19YJA630060)。
关键词 工作设计 团队心理授权 工程项目团队 定性比较分析 work design team psychological empowerment construction project team qualitative comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献56

  • 1杨中芳,彭泗清.中国人人际信任的概念化:一个人际关系的观点[J].社会学研究,1999(2):3-23. 被引量:564
  • 2夏鑫,何建民,刘嘉毅.定性比较分析的研究逻辑——兼论其对经济管理学研究的启示[J].财经研究,2014,40(10):97-107. 被引量:86
  • 3[4]麦迪思.企业生命周期[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997.
  • 4莫斯利,彼特瑞,麦根森.(2003).督导管理、授权和培养员工的艺术.第五版.刘庆林译.北京.人民邮电出版社.40-43.
  • 5王国猛.(2008).团从,心理授权的结构及其与团烈绩效的关系.杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文.
  • 6Alderbesti, K. (2002) . A comparative study: The effective strategic alliances on knowledge, creation capabilities and organizational climate measures. Ph.D. The George Washington University.
  • 7Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) . The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research, Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6) , 1173-1182.
  • 8Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988) . The empowerment process, integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13 (3) , 85-105.
  • 9Costigan, R. D., liter, S. S., & Berman, J. J. (1998) . Amulti-dimensional study of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10 (3) , 303-317.
  • 10Culbert, S., & McDonough, J. (1986) . The politics of trust and organization empowerment. Public Administration Quarterly, 10 (2), 171-18.

共引文献1952

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部