摘要
《四库全书总目》著录的一百六十五篇总集类提要经前人考辨者达一百二十八篇,然局部性、选择性考辨视野下所遗留的尚需澄清之问题,在集部总集类提要中普遍存在。在前人研究基础上,本文对宋及宋前四十一篇总集类提要文本进行考辨,正其讹误,还原事实,共得相关结论一百一十三条,其中辨析“《文苑英华》为宋白领衔修纂、《江湖后集》提要中漏记吴仲孚”两条为补充胡玉缙先生之研究成果,其余均为首次提出和考辨之结论。思路上,以提要和总集类作品在文本、事实方面存在的差异为切入点,发现、提出和辨正相关问题。材料上,对四库底本文献如《文选颜鲍谢诗评》《吴都文粹》《江湖小集》《古文集成前集》等的运用,为提要考辨提供了一种独特的文献视角。
The 128 out of 165 contents summaries in Ji Bu Literature collection of Si Ku Quan Shu's Complete Contents have been researched by predecessors.But these problems need to be clarified commonly existed in the Ji Bu Literature collection due to the partial and alternative research vision.This paper just discriminates the errors and reverts the facts of 41 contents summaries in Ji Bu Literature Collection of Song Dynasty and before it.It includes 113 relational conclusions.Two conclusions that the leading editor of Wen Yuan Ying Hua is Song Bai and Wu Zhongfu is omitted in Jiang Hu Hou Ji,who supplements the research conclusion of Hu Yujin.Others are proposed for the first time.It provides research idea that the detection and justify of the problems based on the difference of text and fact between the contents summaries and Literature collection.It contributes the distinctive viewpoint of literature application by quoting Si Ku Di Ben bibliography such as Wen Xuan Yan Bao Xie Shi Xuan Ping and Wu Du Wen Cui and Jiang Hu Xiao Ji and Gu Wen Ji Cheng Qian Ji.
出处
《贵州文史丛刊》
2021年第1期28-46,共19页
GUIZHOU CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL JOURNAL
关键词
《四库全书总目》
总集类
辨正
Si Ku Quan Shu's Complete Contents
Ji Bu Literature collection
Justify