2Davenport, J. L. Consistency effects between objects in scenes [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2007, 35: 393-401.
3Gronau, N., Neta, M., & Bar, M. Integrated contextual representations for objects' identities and their locations [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2008, 20: 371-388.
4Green, C., & Hummel, J. E. Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceotion and Perrformance ,2006,32:1107-1119.
5Riddoch, M. J., Pippard, B., Booth, L., Rickell, J., Summers, J., Brownson, A., & Humphreys, G. W. Effects of action relations on the configural coding between objects [J]. Journal of Experimental Psy- chology: Human Perception and Performance, 2011, 37: 580-587.
6Davenport, J. L., Potter, M. C. Scene consistency in object and scene perception [J]. Psychology Science, 2004, 15: 559-564.
7Vo, M. L.-H., & Henderson, J. M. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic incon- sistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception [J]. Journal of Vision, 2009, 9(3): 1-15.
8Bar, M. Visual objects in context [J]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2004, (5): 617-629.
9Katherine L. Roberts and Glyn W, Humphreys. Distinguishing the effects of action relations and scene context on object perception [J]. Visual Cognition, 2013, 21(8): 1033-1052.
10Chun, M. M. Contextual cueing of visual attention [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000, (4): 174-178.
