期刊文献+

肝癌局部治疗——消融或切除? 被引量:5

Local treatment of liver cancer:Ablation or resection?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 肝癌是我国常见的恶性肿瘤之一,手术切除目前仍然是肝癌患者首选的根治性方法,但大部分患者由于受肿瘤大小及部位、肝功能和整体状况的影响,不能耐受手术切除。近年来,以射频和微波为代表的局部消融技术迅速发展,并在临床中广泛应用,更被誉为堪与外科切除相媲美的肝癌根治性治疗的新技术。就局部消融与外科切除在肝癌治疗中的应用和选择作一简介。 Liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China.Surgical resection is still the preferred radical treatment method for patients with liver cancer;however,most patients cannot tolerate surgical resection due to the influence of tumor size,tumor location,liver function,and general condition.In recent years,local ablation techniques,such as radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation,have developed rapidly and are widely used in clinical practice,and they are even known as new techniques comparable to surgical resection for the radical treatment of liver cancer.This article briefly introduces the application and selection of local ablation and surgical resection in the treatment of liver cancer.
作者 史瑶平 翟博 SHI Yaoping;ZHAI Bo(Department of Interventional Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China)
出处 《临床肝胆病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第3期506-509,共4页 Journal of Clinical Hepatology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81801800)。
关键词 肝肿瘤 消融技术 肝切除术 Liver Neoplasms Ablation Techniques Hepatectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献50

  • 1Beat M Künzli,Paolo Abitabile,Christoph A Maurer.Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: Actual limitations and potential solutions in the future[J].World Journal of Hepatology,2011,3(1):8-14. 被引量:15
  • 2DECODE Study Group,on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemio logy Study Group.Glucose tolerance and mortality:comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria [J].The Lancet,1999,354:617-621.
  • 3DECODE Study Group,on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemio logy Study Group.Consequences of the new diagnostic criteria for diabetes in old er men and women [J].Diabetes Care,1999,22:1667-1671.
  • 4DECODE Study Group,on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemio logy.Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality:comparison of fasting and 2 -hour diagnostic criteria [J].Arch Intern Med,2001,161:397-405.
  • 5Zargar A H,Masoodi S R,Khan A K,et al.Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance-lack of agreement between the two categories in a North Indian population [J].Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2001,51:145-149.
  • 6Choi Y H,Ahn Y B,Yooh K H,et al.New ADA criteria in the Korean population:fasting blood glucose is not enough for diagnosis of mild diabetes e specially in the elderly [J].Korean J Intern Med,2000,15:211-217.
  • 7Drzewoski J,Czupryniak L.Concordance between fasting and 2 h post-gluco se challenge criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and glucose intoler ance in high risk individuals [J].Diabet Med,2001,18:29-31.
  • 8Gimeno S G,Ferreira S R,Franco L J,et al.Comparison of glucose tolerance categories according to World Health Organization and American Diabetes Associa tion diagnostic criteria in a population-based study in Brazil.The Japanese-Br azillian Diabetes Study Group [J].Diabetes Care,1998,21:1889-1892.
  • 9Gomez-Perez F J,Aguilar-Salinas C A,Lopez-Alvarenga J C,et al.Lack of agreement between the World Health Organization Category of impaired glucose to lerance and the American Diabetes Association category of impaired fasting gluco se [J].Diabetes Care,1998,21:1886-1888.
  • 10World Health Organization Study Group.Diabetes mellitus [J].WHO Tech Rep Ser,1985,727:1-104.

共引文献337

同被引文献61

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部