期刊文献+

影响老年痴呆患者及其照顾者幸福感因素的横断面研究 被引量:3

A cross-sectional study of the effects of well-being of dementia patients and their caregivers
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究影响痴呆患者及其照顾者幸福感的因素,为提高其幸福感提供指导。方法选取2015年4月至2016年4月入住北京协和医院神经内科确诊为痴呆的患者及其照顾者共94对,记录每例患者及其照顾者的人口统计学资料,记录痴呆患者的简易智力状态检查(MMSE)评分,照顾者的角色负荷量表(ROS)评分,两者的二元压力量表(DRS)评分,两者的痴呆患者生命质量量表评分(QOL-D)及抑郁自评量表(CES-D)评分。用分层线性模型做各个层面的影响因子与痴呆患者-照顾者的QOL-D及CES-D评分回归分析。结果固定效应模型中未控制变量多层线性模型分析:QOL-D的结果提示,痴呆患者的评分为β1j=(31.01±0.77)分,照顾者的评分为β_(2j)=(35.15±0.88)分,CES-D的结果提示,痴呆患者和照顾者的评分分别为β1j=(14.55±1.03)分和β_(2j)=(13.11±1.44)分。随机效应模型提示对于痴呆患者及照顾者的QOL-D评分及CES-D评分方差成分的异质性差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)值为98.94~168.06,P<0.01)。调整2级模型,调整后回归分析中最终结果提示:照顾者的关系压力(DRS),痴呆患者的自我意识评估(MMSE),照顾者护理相关的压力(ROS),痴呆患者关系压力(DRS)显著影响二者幸福感中的生命质量评分(QOL-D)(β值为-3.22~0.43,P<0.05)。痴呆患者关系压力(DRS),照顾者护理相关的压力(ROS),照顾者关系压力(DRS)显著影响二者幸福感中的抑郁症状(β值为5.34、3.26、1.62,P<0.05)。结论需要对痴呆患者及照顾者进行全面评估,合并家庭关系紧张,照顾者护理相关的压力大需进行必要的心理疏导。 Objective To study the factors influencing the happiness of dementia patients and their caregivers,provide guidance for improving their well-being.Methods A total of 94 pairs of patients and their caregivers who were admitted to the neurology department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from April 2015 to April 2016 were selected,the demographics of each patient and their caregivers were recorded.The Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE)of patients with dementia,Role of Overload Scale(ROS)of caregivers,Dyadic Relationship Strain(DRS),Quality of Life for Dementia(QOL-D),Self-Evaluation Scale-Depression(CES-D)were recorded.Layered linear model was used to make regression analysis between the influencing factors and the scores of QOL-D and CES-D.Results The results of the multi-layer linear model of uncontrolled variables in the fixed effect model:the results of QOL-D suggested that the score of patients with dementia wasβ1j=31.01±0.77,and the score of caregivers wasβ_(2j)=35.15±0.88;the results of CES-D suggested that the scores of dementia patients and caregivers wereβ1j=14.55±1.03 andβ_(2j)=13.11±1.44,respectively.The random effects model suggested that there were statistical differences in the heterogeneity of the QOL-D score and the CES-D score variance component for dementia patients and caregivers(χ^(2) values were 98.94-168.06,P<0.01).It indicated that the data was heterogeneous,adjusting the level 2 model,and the final results in the adjusted regression analysis suggested:caregiver relationship pressure(DRS),dementia patient self-awareness assessment(MMSE),caregiver care-related stress(ROS),dementia patient relationship stress(DRS)significantly affected the quality of life score(QOL-D)in both well-being(βvalues were-3.22-0.43,P<0.05).Dementia patient relationship stress(DRS),caregiver-related stress(ROS),and caregiver relationship stress(DRS)significantly affected depressive symptoms in both well-being(βvalues were 5.34,3.26,1.62,P<0.05).Conclusions A comprehensive assessment of dementia patients and caregivers is needed.The combined family relationship is tense and the pressure associated with caregivers needs to be psychologically counseled.
作者 裴晓燕 曹硕楠 于淑云 郑文颖 Pei Xiaoyan;Cao Shuonan;Yu Shuyun;Zheng Wenying(Department of Neurosurgery Cerebrovascular Disease Area 1,Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated Capital Medical University,Beijing 100070,China;Department of Cognitive Impairment Ward,Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated Capital Medical University,Beijing 100070,China)
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2021年第7期494-498,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 生活质量 抑郁 家庭护理 二元分析 痴呆 Quality of life Depression Home care Binary analysis Dementia
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1蒋芬,王卫红,王庆妍,唐四元.老年期痴呆患者照顾者的照顾感受[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(3):759-762. 被引量:23
  • 2彭丹涛,许贤豪,刘江红,矫玉娟,张华,殷剑,孟晓梅,谢琰臣,冯凯.简易智能精神状态检查量表检测老年期痴呆患者的应用探讨[J].中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2005,12(4):187-190. 被引量:149
  • 3王炜,王鲁宁.“蒙特利尔认知评估量表”在轻度认知损伤患者筛查中的应用[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(5):414-416. 被引量:242
  • 4Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment:transition between aging and Alzheimer s disease[J]. Neurologia,2000, 15(3):93-101.
  • 5Nasreddine ZS,Phinips NA,Bedirian V,et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA:a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc,2005,53:695-699.
  • 6Smith T, Gildeh N, Holmes C, et al.The Montreal Cognitive Assessment:validity and utility in a memory clinic setting[J]. Can J Psychiatry, 2007, 52(5):329-332.
  • 7Artero S, Petersen R, Touchon J, et al. Revised criteria for mild cognitive impairment:validation within a longitudinal population study[J].Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord,2006, 22(5-6):465-470.
  • 8Petersen RC.Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity[J]. J Intern Med,2004,256(3):183-194.
  • 9Peterson RC, Smich GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment:clinical characterization and outcome[J]. Arch Neurol, 1999,56(3):303-308.
  • 10汤慈美.神经心理学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2002.12-33.

共引文献143

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部