论保证合同纠纷的诉讼形态

On the Litigation Form of Guarantee Contract Dispute

保证合同纠纷是一种多数人纠纷,涉及到连带责任、补充责任等颇具讨论意义的问题。准确定位保证合同纠纷的诉讼形态是解决保证合同纠纷诉讼进行问题的第一环节。保证合同纠纷适用固有的必要共同诉讼是必要共同诉讼在职权主义诉讼模式下趋于泛化的结果,而类似的必要共同诉讼适用于既判力扩张的情形,通过对实体与程序利益的平衡,其诉讼形态归于普通共同诉讼模式才是最佳选择。而通过对主张与证据共通原则、反射效、争点效、预决效等理论的运用,以及某些制度建设可以最终形成保证合同纠纷从审理至判决再到执行阶段的完整的程序链。

The guarantee contract dispute is a kind of dispute among many people,involving joint liability,supplementary liability and other issues of great significance for discussion.It is the first step to solve the problem of guarantee contract dispute litigation to locate the litigation form of guarantee contract dispute accurately.The application of the true necessary action to the guarantee contract disputes is the result of the generalization of the necessary joint action under the mode of authoritarianism,while the similar necessary action is suitable for the expansion of res judicature.By balancing the interests of entity and procedure,it is the best choice to attribute the litigation form to the common joint action mode.Through the application of the principle of claims and evidence in common,reflection effect,contention effect,pre-determination effect and other theories,as well as the establishment of some systems,a complete procedural chain can be formed from the trial to the judgment and then to the execution stage of the guarantee contract dispute.