便携式内窥镜视频系统辅助鼻咽喉检查治疗的效果评价

Effect evaluation of portable endoscopic video system in the treatment of nasopharynx examination

目的探讨便携式内窥镜视频系统辅助鼻咽喉检查治疗效果。方法2019年1月1日—2019年12月31日,选取本院眼耳鼻颌面外科院内住院查房、门急诊中实施的168例患者作为研究对象,采用随机法对纳入患者进行分组,各分为84例。实验组采用自主研制的便携式内窥镜视频系统,对照组采用传统的喉镜腔镜系统。比较两组患者检查治疗效果、医务人员使用过程中的满意度和患者检查治疗过程中的满意度并进行效果评价。结果两组患者鼻咽喉镜腔镜系统检查治疗时间比较,实验组时间为13.4 min;对照组时间为22.9 min;患者对鼻咽喉镜腔镜系统检查治疗的满意度比较主要从检查治疗效果、检查治疗体验效果进行评价,实验组满意度91.67%,对照组满意度86.91%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.695,P=0.030);医务人员对两组鼻咽喉镜腔镜系统检查治疗使用的满意度评价主要从性能参数、检查治疗使用效果等方面进行评价,性能参数主要包括便携性、图像质量、操作方法、运营成本等方面,实验组满意度92%,对照组满意度77%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=6.834,P=0.009)。结论便携式内窥镜视频系统操作简单、使用方便,不仅能够满足患者的诊疗需要并减少患者的诊疗时间,而且能够满足医务人员使用过程中的便携性,能够提高医疗质量,非常适合临床使用。

Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of portable endoscopic video system assisted nasopharynx examination.Methods From January 1,2019 to December 31,2019,168 patients in the department of ophthalmology,otorhino-maxillofacial surgery in our hospital were selected as the research objects.The patients were randomly divided into 84 cases.The experimental group used the self-developed portable endoscope video system,while the control group used the traditional laryngoscope system.The treatment effect,satisfaction of medical staff and satisfaction of patients in the process of examination and treatment were compared between the two groups,and the effect was evaluated.Results Compared to the treatment time of nasopharynx and laryngoscope system between the two groups,the experimental group time was 13.4 min;the control group time was 22.9 min;the patients'satisfaction with nasopharyngoscope system examination and treatment was mainly evaluated from the examination and treatment effect,the experimental group satisfaction was 91.67%,while the control group was 86.91%,the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=4.695,P=0.030);medical staffs'satisfaction evaluation on the use of nasopharynx and laryngoscope system in the two groups was mainly evaluated from the performance parameters,examination and treatment effect,and the performance parameters mainly included portability,image quality,operation methods,operating costs and other aspects.The satisfaction of the experimental group was 92%,and that of the control group was 77%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(χ^(2)=6.834,P=0.009).Conclusion The portable endoscopic video system is easy to operate use.It can not only meet the needs of patients and reduce the diagnosis and treatment time of patients,but also meet the portability of medical staffs in the process of using,and can improve the quality of medical treatment,which is very suitable for clinical use.