期刊文献+

自身免疫性溶血性贫血抗体特征与不同输血方案疗效评估 被引量:4

Antibody characteristics of autoimmune hemolytic anemia and evaluation of efficacy of different blood transfusion schemes
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析自身免疫性溶血性贫血(AIHA)患者不规则抗体情况,确定抗体性质,对比不同RBC筛选方式输注效果,为AIHA临床输血提供依据。方法:回顾性统计125例AIHA患者自身抗体、同种抗体、DAT情况,分析自身抗体、DAT凝集强度与溶血关系。将AIHA患者分为3组,A组输注最小不相容洗涤RBC,B组输注Rh相同或匹配性RBC,C组输注体外溶血试验匹配RBC,比较3组间RBC治疗效果和不良输血反应。结果:125例患者单独含自身抗体89例,自身抗体合并同种抗体33例,自身抗体、DAT凝集强度越高,患者血红蛋白(Hb)越低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);各组RBC输注前后Hb、RBC、Hct、胆红素、Ret差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);C组RBC输注显效率高于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);各组不良输血反应率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:紧急情况可以输注ABO、Rh相同或配合性RBC,非紧急情况可以筛选ABO、Rh同型RBC后利用体外溶血试验交叉配血。 Objective:To analyze the situation of irregular antibodies in autoimmune hemolytic anemia(AIHA) patients,determine the nature of the antibodies,compare the effects of different RBC screening and infusion methods,and provide a basis for AIHA clinical transfusion. Method:The autoantibodies,alloantibodies,and DAT of 125 patients with AIHA were retrospectively analyzed,and the relationship between the autoantibodies and DAT agglutination intensity and hemolysis was analyzed.AIHA patients were divided into 3 groups.Group A was infused with minimally incompatible wash RBC.Group B was infused with the same Rh or matched RBC.Group C was infused with matching RBC with hemolysis test in vitro.The RBC treatment effects and adverse transfusion reactions between the three groups were compared. Result:There were 89 cases of 125 patients with autoantibodies alone and 33 cases of autoantibodies combined with alloantibodies.The higher the agglutination intensity of autoantibodies and DAT,the lower the Hb of the patients.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There were significant differences in Hb,RBC,HCT,bilirubin and RET before and after RBC infusion in each group(all P<0.05).The RBC infusion efficiency in group C was significantly higher than that in groups A.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in adverse transfusion reaction rate among the groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:In the case of emergency,infusion of the same or compatible RBC of ABO and Rh could be performed.In non-emergency situations,RBC of ABO and Rh of the same type could be screened for cross-matching after hemolysis test in vitro.
作者 陈新春 邓绍团 龙韵洪 卢春生 CHEN Xinchun;DENG Shaotuan;LONG Yunhong;LU Chunsheng(Department of Blood Transfusion,Shenzhen Hospital,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenzhen,518107,China;Department of Laboratory Medicine,the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University;Department of Laboratory Medicine,Second People’s Hospital of Futian District)
出处 《临床血液学杂志(输血与检验)》 CAS 2020年第6期821-824,共4页 Journal of Clinical Hematology(Blood Transfusion & Laboratory Medicine)
关键词 自身免疫性溶血性贫血 不规则抗体 直接抗人球蛋白试验 不良输血反应 autoimmune hemolytic anemia irregular antibodies direct antiglobulin test adverse transfusion reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献46

共引文献204

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部