期刊文献+

三种自动勾画软件应用于中上腹部危及器官勾画的准确性研究 被引量:5

Study on the Accuracy of Three Automatic Delineation Softwares for the Delineation of Organs at Risk in Abdomen
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较三种自动勾画软件(Pinnacle 9.10、LinkingMed和Manteia)勾画上腹部危及器官(OAR)的准确性。方法选取了26例上腹部肿瘤患者,由一名资深的临床医师手动勾画OAR(肝脏、脊髓、双肾、胰腺和胃),并采用三种软件对其进行自动勾画。以手动勾画为金标准,计算并比较三种自动勾画结果的质心偏差(Center of Mass Deviation,DC)、Dice相似性系数(Dice Similarity Coefficient,DSC)、Hausdorff距离(Hausdorff Distance,HD)、包容性指数(Inclusive Index,IncI)和敏感性指数(Sensitivity Index,SI)。采用单因素方差分析评价各项指标的统计学差异,同时比较了三种软件勾画结果的准确性。结果肝、双肾和脊髓的DC、DSC、HD、IncI和SI,LinkingMed和Manteia组与Pinnacle组有统计学差异(P<0.05),inkingMed和Manteia组的勾画效果优于Pinnacle组。对于胃和胰腺的结果,Manteia组优于Lingkingmed组,除了IncI,均有统计学差异。结论对于肝、肾和脊髓,这三种软件均有较好的勾画效果,LinkingMed和Manteia的勾画效果更优于Pinnacle软件。对于胃和胰腺,Manteia的勾画效果优于LinkingMed。 Objective To compare the accuracy of three kinds of automatic delineation software(Pinnacle 9.10,Linkingmed and Manteia)in delineating upper abdominal organs at risks(OARs).Methods The OARs(liver,spinal cord,kidneys,pancreas and stomach)was manually drawn by a senior clinician in 26 patients with upper abdominal tumors,and three kinds of software were used to automatically draw the OARs.By the standard of the manual delineation,the index of center of mass deviation(DC),dice similarity coefficient(DSC),Hausdorff distance(HD),inclusive index(IncI)and sensitivity index(SI)were compared for three kinds of segmentation results.One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the statistical difference of each index,and the accuracy of the three software was compared.Results There were significant differences in DC,DSC,HD,IncI and SI of the liver,kidneys and spinal cord between the Lingkingmed and Manteia,groups with the pinnacle group(P<0.05).The automatic delineation results in Lingkingmed and Manteia were both better than those in Pinnacle.For the results of stomach and pancreas,Manteia group was better than Lingkingmed group,there were signficantly differences(P<0.05)in Lingkingmed and Manteia,except for IncI.Conclusion All three softwares of auto-segmentation can satisfactorily contour the liver,kidneys and spinal cord.The performance in Lingkingmed and Manteia was better than Pinnacle,and Manteia was better than Lingkingmed in the delineation of stomach and pancreas.
作者 李桢 洪文松 胡丽彩 LI Zhen;HONG Wensong;HU Licai(Department of Radiotherapy,Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital,Guangzhou Guangdong 510317,China)
出处 《中国医疗设备》 2021年第3期66-70,共5页 China Medical Devices
关键词 上腹部危及器官 自动勾画 定量分析 organs at risk in abdomen automatic contouring quantitative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献27

  • 1潘建基,洪金省,张瑜.鼻咽癌常规外照射致后组颅神经损伤的危险因素研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2006,26(5):490-493. 被引量:18
  • 2Mackie TR, Kapatoes J, Ruchala K, et al. Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy [ J] .Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003,56 ( 1 ) : 89-105. DOI : 10.1016/S0360-3016 ( 03 ) 00090-7.
  • 3Geets X, Dalsne JF, Areangeli S, et al. Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngeal-laryngeal tumour,parotid glands and cervical spinal cord: comparison between CT-scan and MRI [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2005,77 ( 1 ) : 25-31. DOI: 10. 1016/j. radonc. 2005.04.010.
  • 4Fiorino C, Reni M, Bolognesi A, et al. Intra-and interobserver variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles:implications for conformal treatment planning [J]. Radiother Oncol, 1998,47 (3) :285-292.DOI : 10.1016/S0167-8140(98) 0021-8.
  • 5Sim R,Isambert A, Gregoire V, et al. A pre-clinical assessment of an atlas-based automatic segmention tool for the head and neck [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2009, 93 ( 3 ) : 474-478. DOI: 10. 1016/j. radonc.2009.08.013.
  • 6Zijdenbos AP, Dawant BM, Margolin RA, et al. Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation [ J] .IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 1994, 13 ( 4 ) : 716-724. DOI : 10.1109/42.363096.
  • 7Zhang L, Garden AS, Lo J-, et al. Muhiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 64 ( 5 ) : 1559-1569.DOI : 10. l O16/j.ijrobp,2005.12.023.
  • 8Wang X, Lu j, Xiong X, et al. Anatomic and dosimetric changes during the treatment course of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma [ J ].Med Dosim,2010, 35(2) : 151-157.DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2009.06.007.
  • 9Hansen EK, Bucci MK, Quivey JM, et al. Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer [J] .Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,64(2) :355-362.DOI:10. 1016/j. ijrobp.2005.07.957.
  • 10Reed VK, Woodward WA, Zhang L, et al. Automatic segmentation of whole-breast using atlas approach and deformable imagereglstration [ J ].Int J Radiat Oncol Bio Phys, 2009,73 ( 5 ) : 1493-1500.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.001.

共引文献59

同被引文献52

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部