期刊文献+

基于扎根理论的家庭消费中夫妻品牌兼容性的概念维度及提升策略研究 被引量:3

Concept Dimensions and Promotion Strategies of Couple Brand Compatibility in Family Consumption——Research Based on Grounded Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 鉴于家庭消费中夫妻品牌兼容性对家庭购买的幸福感具有重要影响,采用扎根研究与实证检验的方法,对家庭消费中夫妻品牌兼容性的维度及提升策略进行了研究。研究表明:家庭消费中夫妻品牌兼容性包括实用兼容性、道德兼容性和认知兼容性。其中品牌实用兼容性包括功能操作共识性、设计审美共识性和价格接受共识性;道德兼容性包括安全保障共识性、绿色健康共识性和信息可靠共识性;认知兼容性包括政治信念共识性、地位象征共识性与品质形象共识性。 Couple brand compatibility in family consumption has an important impact on the family purchase happiness.In this study,using grounded theory and empirical test,we explored concept dimensions and promotion strategies of couple brand compatibility in family consumption.According to the result,it shows that couple brand compatibility includes utility compatibility,moral compatibility and cognitive compatibility.Among them,utility compatibility includes functional operation consensus,design aesthetic consensus and price acceptability consensus;moral compatibility includes safety and security consensus,green and healthy consensus and reliable information consensus;and cognitive compatibility includes political belief consensus,status symbol consensus and quality image consensus.
作者 孙茹 李东进 张宇东 SUN Ru;LI Dongjin;ZHANG Yudong(Nankai University,Tianjin,China)
机构地区 南开大学商学院
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期410-417,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71832005,71772092)。
关键词 家庭消费 夫妻品牌兼容性 购买幸福感 family consumption couple brand compatibility purchase happiness
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1姜浩,鲍祥霖,司有和.品牌符号对农产品消费的预期理论研究[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(4):797-798. 被引量:3
  • 2Scott.Institutions and organizations[M].Thousand Oaks,Calif:Sage Publications,1995.
  • 3Suchman.Managing Legitimacy:Strategic and Institutional Approaches[J].Academy of Management Review,1995,20,571-610.
  • 4Deephouse.Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism,49-77,in the Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism[M].Los Angeles,London:Sage Publications,2008.
  • 5Meyer,John W,Brian Rowan.Institutionalized organizations:formal structure as myth and ceremony[J].American Journal of Sociology,1977,83:340-363.
  • 6DiMaggio,Powell.The Iron Cage Revisited:Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,American Sociological Review,1983,48 (2):147-160.
  • 7Aldrich,Fiol.Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation[J].Academy of Management Review,1994,19(4):645-670.
  • 8Greenwood.Theorizing change:The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45 (1):58-80.
  • 9Archibald M E.Between isomorphism and Market Partitioning:How Organizational Competcncies and Resources Foster Cultural and Sociopolitical Legitimacy,and Pronote Organizational Survival[J].Research in the Sociology of Organizations,2004,22:171-211.
  • 10Singh.Performance,slack,and risk taking in organizational decision making[J].Academy of Management Journal,1986,29 (3):562-585.

共引文献43

同被引文献63

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部