摘要
[目的/意义]《南京共识》规定下的“大情报观”暂时性地终结了已有的情报观争论,为情报学发展指明了方向。然而,情报学学科内部的异质性仍有讨论的空间。[方法/过程]本文在对情报学学科内部异质性进行梳理的基础上描述了大情报观下广义情报学研究的研究体系,进而从过程观与历史性两个维度刻画了广义情报学研究的实用方法体系。[结果/结论]最后提出了“求新声于异邦”的实践进路,并据此尝试性地区分了统计学传统与阐释学传统这两种源于西方的方法论传统。
[Objective/Significance]The Big Information View under the“Nanjing Consensus”temporarily ended the existing debate on the view of information and pointed out the direction for the development of information science.However,there is still room for discussion on the internal heterogeneity of information science.[Methods/Process]On the basis of sorting out the internal heterogeneity of information science,this paper describes the research system of general information science under the Big Information View,and then depicts the practical method system of general information science from the perspective of process and historicity.[Results/Conclusions]Finally,this paper puts forward the practical approach of“seeking innovation from foreign countries”,and tries to distinguish between the two traditions of statistics and hermeneutics,which derive from the western methodological convention.
作者
吴剑泽
朱庆华
WU Jianze;ZHU Qinghua(School of Information Management,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出处
《情报工程》
2021年第1期4-15,共12页
Technology Intelligence Engineering
关键词
大情报观
情报学
研究方法
方法体系
Big Information View
information science
research method
method system