期刊文献+

冠脉CTA与CAG的临床应用对比研究 被引量:11

Comparative Study on the Clinical Application of CTA and CAG in Coronary Artery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨64排128层螺旋CT冠状动脉CTA和冠状动脉造影CAG的临床应用对比研究。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年10月间35例均行冠脉CTA与CAG的患者影像资料,将左右冠状动脉主干及其小分支的狭窄数量及狭窄程度进行对比分析。结果发现CAG检查在左右冠状动脉主干的狭窄数量检出率及狭窄程度准确率与CTA检查结果基本一致(P<0.001,Kappa=0.518);但CAG检查在左右冠状动脉小分支的狭窄数量检出率及狭窄程度准确率均明显比CTA检查高(P=0.974,Kappa=0.001)。结论冠脉CTA检查可以准确对左右冠状动脉主干的狭窄数量检出率及狭窄程度作出判断,但对于左右冠状动脉小分支的判断上仍有提高空间;CAG作为冠心病的"金标准",通过对比研究分析,可验证CTA判断的准确性,并提高冠脉小分支狭窄的检出率,为临床提供最真实的影像学资料。 Objective To study the clinical application of 64 slices 128 slice spiral CT coronary CTA and CAG.Methods The imaging data of 35 patients with CTA and CAG from January 2018 to October 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.The number and degree of stenosis of left and right main coronary arteries and their small branches were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the detection rate and the accuracy rate of stenosis degree of the left and right main coronary arteries between CAG and CTA,but there was no significant difference between the two(P<0.001,Kappa=0.518).however the detection rate and the accuracy rate of stenosis degree of CAG in the left and right small branches of coronary arteries were significantly higher than that of CTA,and the difference was statistically significant Meaning(P=0.974,Kappa=0.001).Conclusion CTA is a noninvasive and high spatial resolution imaging diagnostic technique,and it can accurately determine the detection rate and degree of stenosis of the left and right main coronary arteries,which has great clinical application value.However,the detection rate and degree of stenosis of the left and right small coronary artery branches still need to be improved technically.CAG as coronary heart Through comparative study and analysis,we can verify the accuracy of CTA judgment,improve the detection rate of small branch stenosis of the coronary artery,and provide the most real imaging data for clinical practice.
作者 黎子锋 曾红辉 张浩 潘壬清 邓周强 LI Zi-feng;ZENG Hong-hui;ZHANG Hao;PAN Ren-qing;DENG Zhou-Qiang(Department of Radiology,Xin Rongqi Hospital,Foshan 528303,Guangdong Province,China)
出处 《罕少疾病杂志》 2021年第2期41-43,共3页 Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases
关键词 冠脉CTA CAG 冠状动脉狭窄数量 狭窄程度 冠心病 Coronary CTA CAG Number of Coronary Stenosis Degree of Stenosis Coronary Heart Disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献72

  • 1姜婕,虞华鹏,赵成军,赵震,高成志.冠状动脉造影和血管内超声诊断冠心病的对比研究[J].山东医药,2008,48(20):82-83. 被引量:13
  • 2李良,夏云峰,刘润梅,翟红霞,殷亚昕,张津津,边宏宇.多排螺旋CT冠脉成像与冠脉造影对冠心病诊断的对比研究[J].感染.炎症.修复,2006,7(1):39-42. 被引量:3
  • 3赵春华,刘登岳.冠状动脉造影正常的冠心病[J].山东医药,2007,47(22):106-107. 被引量:3
  • 4IlkeSE, Murat T, Pauls,et al. Compensatory enlargementof human coronary arteries during progression of atheros-derosis is unrelated to atherorna burden:serial intravascu-lar ultrasound observations from the REVERSAL trial[J]. Eur Heart J,2006,27(14) :1664-1670.
  • 5Mahnken AH,Seyfarth T,Flohr T,et al. Flat-panel detec-tor computed tomography for the assessment of coronaryartery stents:phantom study in comparison with 16-slioespiral computed tomography[J]. Invest Radiol,2005,40(1):8-13.
  • 6Seifarth H,Ozgun M,Raupach R,et al. 64-versus 16-sliceCT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment-In vitro experience[J]. Invest Radiol,2006^41(1) :22-27.
  • 7Hamoir XL, Flohr T, Hamoir V, et al. Coronary ateries:assessment of image quality and optimal reconstructionwindow in retrospecive ECCr-gated multislice CT at 375msgantry rotation Time[J]. Eur Radiol,2009 ,15(2) : 296-304.
  • 8Mas JL,Chatellier G,Beyssen B,et al.Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.N Engl J Med,2006,355:1660-1671.
  • 9SPACE Collaborative Group,Ringleb PA,Allenberg J,et al.30day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients:a randomised non-inferiority trial.Lancet,2006,368:1239-1247.
  • 10International Carotid Stenting Study Investigators,Ederle J,Dobson J,et al.Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis(International Carotid Stenting Study):an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.Lancet,2010,375:985-997.

共引文献152

同被引文献124

引证文献11

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部