期刊文献+

基于驾驶特性的ACC系统安全间距策略研究 被引量:2

Driving safety spacing strategy of ACC system based on driving characteristics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为自适应巡航控制系统(ACC)提出一种基于驾驶特性的行车安全间距策略,在分析对比现行CTH和VTH算法各自的优劣后,考虑驾驶员动态跟车特性,以此为基础对VTH算法进行改进设计。在Matlab/Simulink和Carsim联合仿真平台下使用经典PID控制算法设计的ACC系统上层控制器对CTH、VTH及本文改进VTH策略进行稳态波动速度、急加/减速、恒定车速的复合工况仿真对比。结果表明,基于驾驶特性设计的改进VTH能够在传统VTH及CTH之间获取良好的平衡性能,既能对前车速度激变做出快速响应,也能以平滑且较低的加速度跟踪期望加速度,保证舒适性。 This paper proposes a safe driving distance strategy based on driving characteristics for the design of the ACC system.After analyzing and comparing the respective pros and cons of the current CTH and VTH algorithms,considering the driver’s dynamic following characteristics,the design of VTH algorithm is improved.Under the Matlab/Simulink and Carsim co-simulation platform,the upper-level controller of the ACC system designed by the classic PID control algorithm is used to focus on CTH,VTH,and the improved VTH in this paper to simulate the compound operating conditions of steady-state fluctuating speed,rapid acceleration/deceleration,and constant vehicle speed.The results show that the improved VTH designed in this paper can obtain a good balance performance between the traditional VTH and CTH.It can not only respond quickly to the sudden changes in the speed of the preceding vehicle,but also track the expected acceleration with a smooth and low acceleration to ensure comfort.
作者 施卫 万广轩 刘斌 施卫;万广轩;刘斌(江苏理工学院汽车与交通工程学院,江苏常州213001)
出处 《智能计算机与应用》 2021年第1期156-160,共5页 Intelligent Computer and Applications
基金 江苏省社科“公共利益导向的产教联合培养职教师资的路径与策略研究”(19JYB012)。
关键词 自适应巡航控制系统 动态驾驶特性 可变车头时距策略 期望安全间距 Adaptive Cruise Control system dynamic driving characteristics VTH expected safe spacing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1吴超仲,马晓凤,严新平.考虑驾驶员反应能力的跟驰模型[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2007,31(4):630-632. 被引量:14
  • 2Fairclough S H, May AJ, Carter C. The effect of time headway feedback on following behaviour[J]. Accident Analysis &. Prevention, 1997 ,29 (3) : 387-397.
  • 3Shinar D, Schechtman E. Headway feedback improves intervehicular distance: A field study[J]. Human Factors, 2002,44(3) :474-481.
  • 4Lewis-Evans B, Waard D D, Brookhuis K A. That's close enough-A threshold effect of time headway on the experience of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010.42(6) ,1926-1933.
  • 5Dingus T Av Iahns S K. Horowitz A D. Knipling R Human factors design issues for crash avoidance systems[CJ. In W. Barfield & T. A. Dingus Ceds, ). Human factors in intelligent transportation systems. Mahwah. NJ, Erlbaurn, 55-94.
  • 6Vogel K. A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2003,35 (3) ,427-433.
  • 7Taieb-Maimon M. Learning headway estimation in driving]]]. Human Factors. 2007 .49(4),734-744.
  • 8Taieb-Maimon MvShinar D. Minimum and comfortable driving headways, Reality versus perception[J]. Human Factors, 2001. 43(1),159-172.
  • 9Winsum W V. Heino A. Choice of time-headway in car?following and the role of time-ta-collision information in braking[J]. Ergonomics. 1996 ? 39(4) ,579-592.
  • 10Ohta H. Distance headway behavior between vehicles from the viewpoint ot proxemicsl] J. lAT Kesearch.1994 .IS, 6-14.

共引文献38

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部