期刊文献+

IMMULITE化学发光TSI检测分析性能验证及临床性能评估 被引量:5

An Analytical Verification and Clinical Performance Evaluation for IMMULITE Chemiluminescence TSI Detection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨IMMULITE 2000XPi全自动化学发光免疫分析TSI检测方法的精密度、正确度、线性范围等分析性能,及与Roche Cobas e602电化学发光Anti-TSHR检测方法间的临床性能差异。方法参考美国临床与实验室标准化协会(CLSI)有关文件,分别采用EP-15A3方案验证TSI精密度与正确度,采用EP6-A2方案验证TSI线性区间,并利用EP-17A2方案对TSI和Anti-TSHR进行方法学评估,比较二者临床性能在Graves病中诊断价值的差异。结果IMMULITE 2000XPi TSI正常及异常2个水平的重复性精密度分别为:3.38%、3.14%;中间精密度分别为:3.70%、6.62%;正确度验证区间涵盖验证物质的靶值;线性区间数据分析,二次及三次曲线非线性系数b2和b3均无显著性,数据呈线性。358例临床样本TSI与Anti-TSHR结果比较,灵敏度:89.0%vs 49.0%,配对灵敏度差异:40%(CI:31.9%~47.2%);特异性:94.7%vs 54.7%,配对特异性差异:40%(CI:28.2%~50.5%)。结论IMMULITE 2000XPi全自动发光TSI检测本实验室分析性能均能符合厂家声明,与Roche Cobas e602 Anti-TSHR比较,TSI检测方法在Graves病的辅助诊断中显示出更优的临床性能。 Objective To verify the analytical results of performance with precision,accuracy,and linear range of IMMULITE2000XPi automatic chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA)for TSI detection,so to further evaluate the clinical performance difference between the Roche Cobas e602 electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for Anti-TSHR detection.Methods According to the relevant documents of the American Society for Clinical and Laboratory Standardization(CLSI),the precision,accuracy and linear interval of immulite TSI detection were verified by using the EP-15A3 or EP6-A2 scheme,respectively.Furthermore,the difference of clinical performance for TSI detection in the Graves’disease diagnosis between Immulite TSI and Roche Anti-TSHR was accessed according to the EP-17A2.Results The repeatability precision of Immulite TSI at normal and abnormal concentration levels were 3.38%and 3.14%,respectively,while the intermediate precisions were 3.70%and 6.62%,respectively.The accuracy verification interval covered the target value of the verification substance.Linear interval data analysis indicated that the nonlinear coefficients b2 and b3 of the quadratic and cubic curves were not significant,hence the data patterns were linear.Comparing with Anti-TSHR,TSI showed results as following:sensitivity:89.0%vs 49.0%,paired sensitivity difference:40%(CI:31.9%,47.2%);TSI specificity:94.7%vs 54.7%,paired specificity difference:40%(CI:28.2%,50.5%).Conclusion The analytical performance of immulite 2000XPi TSI detection can meet the manufacturer's statement.Compared with Roche Cobas e602 Anti-TSHR,the TSI detection assay shows a better clinical performance in the auxiliary diagnosis of Graves’disease.
作者 钟丽 张静 张双婕 王志国 ZHONG Li;ZHANG Jing;ZHANG Shuangjie;WANG Zhiguo(Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China)
出处 《标记免疫分析与临床》 CAS 2021年第2期339-342,共4页 Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
关键词 促甲状腺激素刺激性抗体 促甲状腺激素受体抗体 格雷夫斯病 分析性能 临床性能 Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin,TSI Anti-thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibody,Anti-TSHR Graves’disease Analytical performance Clinical performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1李萍,刘小娟,徐克和,黄志刚.利用Westgard标准决定图判定测定方法性能[J].临床检验杂志,2006,24(1):69-70. 被引量:27
  • 2江凌,赖东珍.Bayer ADVIA120全自动血细胞分析仪基本性能及检测项目解析[J].医疗装备,2006,19(3):6-8. 被引量:3
  • 3National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standard. Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement procedures: a statistical approach. Approved guideline. NCCLS document EP6-A. Wayne,Pennsylvania : NCCLS ,2003.1-100.
  • 4Tholen DW. Evaluation of linearity, using the newly approved NCCLS EP6-A protocol. Clin Lab News, 2004, 30:10-12.
  • 5Tholen DW. Alternative statistical techniques to evaluate linearity.Arch Pathol Lab Med, 1992, 116:746-756.
  • 6Kroll MH, Emancipator K. A theoretical evaluation of linearity. Clin Chem, 1993, 39:405-413.
  • 7Krouwer JS, Sehlain B. A method to quantify deviations from assay linearity. Clin Chem, 1993, 39:1689-1693.
  • 8Emancipator K, Kroll MH. A quantitative measure of nonlinearity.Clin Chem, 1993,39:766-772.
  • 9Kroll MH, Pmestgaard J, Michaliszyn E, et al. Evaluation of the extent of nonlinearity in reportable range studies. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2000, 124:1331-1338.
  • 10Jhang JS, Chang CC, Fink DJ. Evaluation of linearity in the clinical laboratory. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2004, 128:44-48.

共引文献46

同被引文献10

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部