期刊文献+

基于STPA的城市埋地燃气管道第三方破坏风险因素分析 被引量:2

Safety Analysis of the Third Party Destruction System for Urban Buried Gas Pipeline
下载PDF
导出
摘要 城市埋地燃气管道输送介质易燃易爆、埋设环境人口密集、施工频繁,极易受到来自第三方的破坏,直接威胁人们的生命财产安全,因此对第三方破坏的风险因素分析和防治十分必要。系统理论过程分析法(STPA)是一种基于系统理论的风险分析方法,该方法不同于传统的风险分析方法——将事故视为由初始事件诱发的一系列事件造成的后果,而是对燃气系统从设计、开发和运行过程进行分析,建立系统安全控制结构,通过分析控制缺陷和缺陷致因实现对风险因素的分析。研究分析出24个燃气管道第三方破坏的风险因素,针对风险因素提出了建议,为燃气管道第三方破坏的风险控制提供依据。 The transportation medium of city buried gas pipeline is inflammable and explosive,the buried environment is densely populated,and the construction is frequent,so it is very easy to be destroyed by the third party,which directly threatens the safety of people's lives and properties,therefore,it is necessary to analyze and prevent the third party damage.System Theory Process Analysis(STPA)is a risk analysis method based on system theory,which is different from the traditional risk analysis method,which regards the accident as the result of a series of events induced by the initial events,it analyzes the process of gas system design,development and operation,establishes the system safety control structure,analyzes the control defects and the causes of the defects to achieve the analysis of risk factors.The risk factors of 24 gas pipeline third party damage are analyzed,and some suggestions are put forward to control the risk of gas pipeline third party damage.
作者 王文和 罗静 易俊 易图云 李凤 WANG Wenhe;LUO Jing;YI Jun;YI Tuyun;LI Feng(School of Safety engineering,Chongqing University of Science and Technology Chongqing 401331;不详)
出处 《工业安全与环保》 2021年第3期6-10,共5页 Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection
基金 国家自然科学基金(51704054) 重庆市基础科学与前沿技术研究重点项目(cstc2017jcyjBX0011) 重庆市社会民生科技创新专项项目(2016shmszx00002)。
关键词 埋地燃气管道 风险分析方法 系统理论过程分析法(STPA) 约束控制 buried gas pipeline hazard analysis method system theoretic process analysis(STPA) constrained control
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1张风华.桥梁风险评估方法与发展研究[J].城市道桥与防洪,2007(5):164-167. 被引量:19
  • 2康晓龙,王伟,赵耀华,华高英.公路隧道火灾事故调研与对策分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(5):110-116. 被引量:48
  • 3谢丽霖,方正,吴晖,等.现代公路隧道安全管理初探[J].建筑防火设计,2007(6) :625 -627.
  • 4Huang G Q, Shi J, Mak K L. Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) over the WWW[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2000, 16(8) : 603 - 608.
  • 5Leveson N. A new approach to hazard analysis for complex systems[C]. Proceedings of International Conference of the System Safety Society, 2003 : 498 - 507.
  • 6Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4): 237 -270.
  • 7Leveson N, Daouk M, Dulac N, et al. Applying STAMP in accident analysis. Proceedings of Second Workshop Inves- tigation and Reporting of Accidents, 2003 : 189 - 210.
  • 8Couturier M. A case study of vioxx using STAMP[D]. Montreal: McGill University, 2010.
  • 9Nancy G, Leveson N. A systems-theoretic approach to safety in software-Intensive systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2004, 1 ( 1 ) : 66 - 86.
  • 10Song Y. Applying system-theoretic accident model and processes (STAMP) to hazard analysisE D. Montreal: Mcmaster University, 2012.

共引文献8

同被引文献18

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部