期刊文献+

Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment:a multicenter prospective study in China 被引量:7

原文传递
导出
摘要 Background:Generic drugs are bioequivalent to their brand-name counterparts;however,concerns still exist regarding the effectiveness and safety of generic drugs because of small sample sizes and short follow-up time in most studies.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term antihypertensive efficacy,cost-effectiveness and cardiovascular outcomes of generic drugs compared with brand-name drugs.Methods:In a multicenter,community-based study including 7955 hypertensive patients who were prospectively followed up for an average of 2.5 years,we used the propensity-score-matching method to match the patients using brand-name drugs to those using generic drugs in a ratio of 1:2,2176 patients using brand-name drugs and 4352 patients using generic drugs.Results:There were no significant differences between generic drugs and brand-name drugs in blood pressure(BP)-lowering efficacy,BP control rate,and cardiovascular outcomes including coronary heart disease and stroke.The adjusted mean(95%confidence interval[CI])of systolic BP(SBP)-lowering was-7.9 mmHg(95%CI,-9.9 to-5.9)in the brand-name drug group and-7.1 mmHg(95%CI,-9.1 to-5.1)in the generic drug group after adjusting for age,sex,body mass index,number of antihypertensive drugs and traditionally cardiovascular risk factors.Among patients aged<60 years,brand-name drugs had a higher BP control rate(47%vs.41%;P=0.02)and a greater effect in lowering SBP compared with generic drugs,with the between-group difference of 1.5 mmHg(95%CI,0.2-2.8;P=0.03).BP control rate was higher in male patients using brand-name drugs compared with those using generic drugs(46%vs.40%;P=0.01).Generic drugs treatment yielded an average annual incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of$315.4 per patient per mmHg decrease in SBP compared with brand-name drugs treatment.Conclusions:Our data suggested that generic drugs are suitable and cost-effective in improving hypertension management and facilitating public health benefits,especially in low-and middle-income areas.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2021年第3期292-301,共10页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
基金 China National Center for Biotechnology Development fund(Nos.2018YFC1312400,2018YFC1312405) National Science and Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period(No.2011BAI11B04) Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences(No.2016-I2M-1-006)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Hogerzeil HY. The concept of essential medicines: Lessons for rich countries. BMJ 2004;329:1169-72. doi: 10.1136/ bmj.329.7475.1169.
  • 2Bigdeli M, Jacobs B, Tomson G, Laing R, Ghaffar A, Dujardin B, et al. Access to medicines from a health system perspective. Health Policy Plan 2013;28:692-704. doi: 10.1 093Jheapol/czs I 08.
  • 3Medicine Pricing and Financing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: http://www.who.intlmedicines/areas/access/ enl. [Last accessed on 2015 JulIO].
  • 4Hogerzeil HV, Jing S. Health-sector reform in China and access to essential medicines. Lancet Glob Health 2013;I:e174-5. doi: 10.1 016/S2214-1 09X( 13)70077-9.
  • 5Hu S. Essential medicine policy in China: Pros and cons. J Med Econ 2013;16:289-94. doi: 10.3111113696998.2012.751176.
  • 6Gray AL, Wirtz VJ, 't Hoen EF, Reich MR, Hogerzeil HV. Essential medicines are still essential. Lancet 2015;386:1601-3. doi: 10.10161 SOI40-6736(15)00514-0.
  • 7Ye L. Study on National Essential Medicine Policy in China (in Chinese). Shanghai: Fudan University; 2008. doi: 10.7666/d. yI972885.
  • 8Ma AN. Feasibility Research on the National Essential Health Service Package in China (in Chinese). Shandong: Weifang Medical University; 2008.
  • 9Zhong QS, Lv J, Sun YJ. Prescription Handbook of Common Diseases (in Chinese). Beijing: Chemical Industry Press; 2010.
  • 10Xu YS, Miao XX, Xie J, Jia P. The Formulary of Common Drugs in Various Clinical Departments (in Chinese). Beijing: Military Medical Science Press; 2010.

共引文献2

同被引文献80

引证文献7

二级引证文献998

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部