期刊文献+

低碳偏好下制造商的碳政策选择研究 被引量:2

Research on Carbon Policy Choice of Manufacturer under Low Carbon Preference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于制造商主导和消费者低碳偏好,分别构建碳税和碳限额与交易模型,研究制造商生产定价和减排问题,重点比较制造商利润随各种政策变量的变化关系。首先,消费者偏好使得制造商选择减排有利,当碳税\碳价格在临界值以内,存在单位产品最佳碳排放量使得制造商利润最大化,而最佳碳排放值与碳限额并无关系;其次,在碳税模型中,制造商利润与碳税成反比关系,而在碳交易模型中情况较为复杂,制造商利润取决于碳价格、碳限额和企业碳排放量,而当碳税等于碳价格时,制造商更倾向于选择碳限额与交易政策;最后,通过算例分析验证上述结论。 Based on manufacturer-led and consumer low-carbon preference, carbon tax and cap-and-trade models were built respectively to study appropriate production, pricing and carbon emissions reduction to maximize the manufacturer’s profit, and the relationship of the manufacturer’s profit changing with various policy variables under different carbon policies is the focus of research.First of all, consumer preference makes it advantageous for manufacturer to reduce carbon emission, and it is found that when carbon tax or carbon priceis within the threshold value,there is an optimal carbon emission that maximizes the profit of manufacturer. Interestingly, the optimal carbon emission value is not related to the carbon quota. Secondly, the profit of manufacturer is inversely proportional to the carbon tax in the carbon tax model. However, in the carbon trading model,it is a little bit complicated,which is determined by the carbon price and the relative value of the carbon emission and carbon quota. And when a carbon tax equals a carbon price,cap-and-trade policy demonstrates a better fit to manufacturer. Finally, the conclusion is verified by numerical analysis.
作者 司冰倩 文风 Si Bingqian;Wen Feng(College of Economics and Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期179-186,共8页 Science and Technology Management Research
关键词 碳税 碳限额与交易 消费者偏好 制造商主导 carbon tax cap-and-trade consumer preference manufacturer-led
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献194

  • 1胡金辉,熊中楷.扩展Hotelling模型下双寡头制造商的低碳策略选择[J].科学决策,2014(4):70-82. 被引量:5
  • 2罗亚中,唐国金.两层非线性规划问题的并行模拟退火全局优化[J].系统仿真学报,2005,17(5):1040-1044. 被引量:13
  • 3国务院发展研究中心课题组.中国经济增长的前景分析[J].决策与信息,2005(8):4-4. 被引量:9
  • 4刘兰翠,范英,吴刚,魏一鸣.温室气体减排政策问题研究综述[J].管理评论,2005,17(10):46-54. 被引量:15
  • 5滕春贤,李智慧.二层规划的理论与应用[M].科学出版社,2002.
  • 6Weitzman M L. Prices vs. Quantities[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1974, 41(4) : 477 -491.
  • 7Metcalf E G. Designing a carbon tax to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions [ J ]. Review of Enviromental Economics and Policy, 2009, 3 ( 1 ) : 63 - 83.
  • 8Avi-Yonah S R, Uhlmann D M. Combating global climate change: Why a carbon tax is a better response to global warming than cap and trade[J]. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 2009, 28(3) : 3 -50.
  • 9Wittneben B F. Exxon is right: Let us re-examine our choice for a cap-and-trade system over a carbon tax[J], Energy Poli- cy, 2009, 37 (6) : 2462 - 2464.
  • 10Mann F R. The case for the carbon tax: How to overcome politics and find our green destiny [ J ]. Environmental Law Report- er, 2009, 39(2) : 10118 - 10126.

共引文献508

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部