期刊文献+

美国大学非终身教职教师权益保障研究——基于美国大学教授协会的经验与反思 被引量:5

Research on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Contingent Faculty in American Universities: Based on the Experience and Reflection of the AAUP
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪70年代以来美国大学非终身教职教师权益保障已成为困扰美国学术职业发展的重要问题。非终身教职教师无法享有与终身教职教师平等的地位和待遇,影响了他们教育教学工作的积极性和人才培养质量,引起人们对高等教育师资水平和教学质量下降的担忧。美国大学教授协会通过引导高校规范大学非终身教职教师聘任标准和程序,公布谴责名单制裁高校侵权行为,建立教师学术共同体进行集体维权等措施,在保障非终身教职教师的权益及维护高等教育质量方面发挥了重要作用。美国大学教授协会的经验值得我国参考和借鉴。 Since the 1970 s, the protection of the rights and interests of contingent faculty in American universities has become an important issue that plagues the development of American academic profession.Contingent faculty couldn’t enjoy the same status and treatment as tenured faculty, which affected their enthusiasm for teaching and the quality of student training, caused people to worry about the decline of teachers’ level and teaching quality in higher education. The AAUP has played an important role in safeguarding the rights and interests of contingent faculty and maintaining the quality of higher education by guiding universities to standardize the standards and procedures for the appointment of contingent faculty, publishing the condemnation list to punish violations in universities and establishing academic community of faculty for collective rights protection. The experience of AAUP is worth our reference.
作者 李子江 杨雪芬 LI Zijiang;YANG Xuefen(Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第1期77-82,共6页 China Higher Education Research
基金 2018年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金课题“美国大学终身教职改革研究”(18YJA880052)的研究成果。
关键词 教师聘任制度 美国大学教授协会 非终身教职教师 权益保障 faculty appointment system AAUP contingent faculty protection of rights and interests
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

  • 1欧阳光华.教授治校:源流、模式与评析[J].高教发展与评估,2005,21(4):54-54. 被引量:29
  • 2Beaky, lenore, et al . The Inclusion in Governance of Faculty Members Holding Contingent Ap- pointments [ J]. Academe ,2013 (4) :77 - 89.
  • 3Jeanette Jeneauh, etal. Contingent Faculty Posi- tions[ EB/OL]. [2016 - 01 - 23 ]. http://www, aaup. org/issues/contingency.
  • 4Rhoades, Gary. Capitalism, Academic Style and Shared Governance [ J ]. Academe,21305 (3) :38 - 42.
  • 5AAUP. It's not over yet: the Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Professor [ J ]. Academe, 2010(7) :11.
  • 6Berry ,Joe, Hoffman, Elizabeth. Including Con- tingent Faculty in Governance [ J ]. Academe,2008 (6) : 29 - 31.
  • 7[美]罗伯特·波斯特.民主、专业知识与学术自由[M].左亦鲁,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014:14.
  • 8王秀丽.从教授治校走向共同治理[J].黑龙江高教研究,2012,30(1):28-31. 被引量:11
  • 9张伟,刘宝存.臆断与启示:美国大学教师经济地位探析——AAUP年度教师经济状况报告透视[J].高等教育研究,2016,37(1):91-99. 被引量:4

共引文献3

同被引文献51

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部