期刊文献+

利好信息冲击是否加剧了个股特质风险? 被引量:2

Does Positive Information Shock Aggravate Idiosyncratic Risk of Individual Stocks?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于散户投资者面对信息冲击时的错误反应,检验利好信息冲击对股票未来特质风险的影响及其潜在机制。研究发现,利好信息冲击会加剧股票未来的特质风险,且散户投资者的情绪和行为在其中起到传导作用。进一步分析结果认为,放松股票的卖空限制和实施互联网约束政策能弱化利好信息冲击对股票特质风险的加剧效应;在牛市或市场波动较小的状态下,上市年限较长、国有、大市值、博彩型和信息披露质量较差的公司中,二者之间的正向关系表现得更为强烈。因此,市场监管者应加强对发生利好信息冲击的个股的监控,完善相关市场机制,加强对散户投资者的引导和教育,从而促进市场稳定有序地发展。 Based on the wrong response of retail investors to information shocks,this paper examines the impact of individual stocks’positive information shock on their future idiosyncratic risk and underlying mechanisms between them.The results show that positive information shock on individual stocks can aggravate their idiosyncratic risk in the future,in which retail investors’sentiment and trading behaviors play a transmission role.Further discussion illustrates that the easing of short-sale constraints and the implementation of Internet constraint policy can weaken the aggravating effect.And among long-listed,state-owned,large-cap,gambling and poor disclosure quality stocks,and in the bull or less-volatile market,the positive impact is stronger.Therefore,market regulators should strengthen the supervision of individual stocks with positive information shock,improve the relevant market mechanism and strengthen the guidance and education for retail investors so as to promote the stable and orderly development of stock market.
作者 王春峰 吴颐瑶 房振明 WANG Chunfeng;WU Yiyao;FANG Zhenming(College of Management and Economics,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China;Research Center of Financial Engineering,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)
出处 《经济与管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期114-126,共13页 Review of Economy and Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“泡沫演变过程中的资产价格行为与投资组合管理研究”(71671122)。
关键词 信息冲击 特质风险 散户投资者 中介效应检验 information shock idiosyncratic risk retail investors mediating effect test
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献109

  • 1张强,杨淑娥.噪音交易、投资者情绪波动与股票收益[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(3):40-47. 被引量:95
  • 2宋双杰,曹晖,杨坤.投资者关注与IPO异象——来自网络搜索量的经验证据[J].经济研究,2011,46(S1):145-155. 被引量:154
  • 3曾颖,陆正飞.信息披露质量与股权融资成本[J].经济研究,2006,41(2):69-79. 被引量:758
  • 4黄波,李湛,顾孟迪.基于风险偏好资产定价模型的公司特质风险研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(11):119-127. 被引量:51
  • 5[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 6[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 7[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 8[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 9[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 10[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182

共引文献8266

同被引文献36

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部