期刊文献+

伊马替尼一线治疗慢性髓系白血病的预后相关因素分析

Prognostic related factors in chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib as first line treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价生物学因素和治疗相关因素在伊马替尼一线治疗慢性髓系白血病(CML)中的预后价值。方法:回顾性分析72例CML慢性期(CML-CP)患者的临床资料,包括性别、年龄、外周血白细胞计数、血小板计数、嗜碱性粒细胞比例、血红蛋白、脾肋下长度、附加染色体(ACAs)、血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平、伊马替尼治疗第3个月和第6个月的分子学反应。采用Kaplan-Meier方法分析上述因素对长期生存(OS)率及无事件生存(EFS)率的影响,Cox比例风险模型评估独立预后因素。结果:中位随访期为61(4~96)个月,5年中位OS率88.89%,5年中位EFS率41.67%。单因素分析显示,各组内OS率比较,外周血嗜碱性粒细胞比例<3%的患者明显高于外周血嗜碱性粒细胞比例≥3%的患者(97.1%vs 84.2%,P<0.05);不存在ACAs患者明显高于存在ACAs患者(97.6%vs 28.3%,P<0.05);LDH<1000 U/L患者明显高于LDH≥1000 U/L患者(96.2%vs 84.8%,P<0.05)。各因素组内EFS率比较显示,脾肋下长度<7 cm患者明显高于脾肋下长度≥7 cm患者(41.8%vs 27.0%,P<0.05);不存在ACAs患者明显高于存在ACAs患者(38.4%vs 10.4%,P<0.01);第3个月早期分子学反应(EMR)≤0.1患者明显高于EMR>0.1患者(45.1%vs 16.8%,P<0.01);第6个月EMR<0.1、0.1~0.01、>0.1的3组患者EFS率分别为57.0%、31.8%、15.4%(均P<0.05)。多因素分析显示存在ACAs[OR=5.821,95%CI(2.015,16.819),P<0.01]及治疗第6个月的EMR[OR=4.850,95%CI(2.887,8.148),P<0.01]对EFS率具有独立的预后价值。结论:外周血嗜碱性粒细胞比例、ACAs、LDH可能影响伊马替尼一线治疗CML患者的OS率,脾大小、ACAs、第3、6个月的EMR均会影响患者的EFS率。ACAs和第6个月的EMR对患者EFS率有独立的预后价值。 Objective:To assess the prognostic value of the biological features and therapy related factors in chronic myeloid leukemia(CML)with imatinib as the first line treatment.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 72 cases of CML chronic phase(CML-CP).The data of biological features including sex,age,counts of peripheral white blood cells,platelet count,proportion of peripheral basophilia cells,hemoglobin,proportion of peripheral blast cells,lactic dehydrogenase(LDH),spleen length below the costal margin and additional cytogenetic abnormalities(ACAs),and the data of therapy related factors including the early molecular response(EMR)at 3rd and 6th month after the imatinib treatment were collected.The effects of the factors above on the overall survival(OS)rate and event-free survival(EFS)rate were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis,univariate analysis by Log-rank test and multivariate analysis by COX regression model.Results:During a median follow-up period of 61(4-96)months,the 5-year OS rate was 88.89%,and 5-year EFS rate was 41.67%.Univariate analysis indicated that the OS rate in the patients with proportion of peripheral blast cells<3%was significantly higher than in those≥3%(97.1%vs.84.2%,P<0.05).The OS rate in the patients without ACAs was significantly higher than in those with ACAs(97.6%vs.28.3%,P<0.05).The OS rate in the patients with LDH<1000 U/L was significantly higher than in those with LDH≥1000 U/L(96.2%vs.84.8%,P<0.05).The EFS rate in patients with spleen length below the costal margin<7 cm was significantly higher than in those with≥7 cm(41.8%vs.27.0%,P<0.05),that in the patients without ACAs was significantly higher than in those with ACAs(38.4%vs.10.4%,P<0.01),that in the patients with the 3rd-month EMR≤0.1 was significantly higher than in those with the 3rd-month EMR>0.1(45.1%vs.16.8%,P<0.01).The EFS rate in the patients with EMR<0.1,0.1-0.01 and>0.1 at 6th month was 57.0%,31.8%and 15.4%respectively(all P<0.05).The multivariate analysis showed that patients with ACAs[OR=5.821,95%CI(2.015,16.819),P<0.01]and worse EMR at the 6th month[OR=4.850,95%CI(2.887,8.148)]were independent poor prognostic factors.Conclusion:Proportion of peripheral blast cells,ACAs and LDH may influence the OS rate of patients with CML with imatinib as first-line treatment,and the size of spleen,ACAs,the EMR at 3rd and 6th month can affect the EFS rate.ACAs and the EMR at 6th month had independent prognostic value.
作者 张淳嘉 郑小玲 郑丹钿 夏维林 苏秀连 ZHANG Chun-jia;ZHENG Xiao-ling;ZHENG Dan-tian;XIA Wei-lin;SU Xiu-lian(Jieyang People's Hospital,Jieyang552000,China)
机构地区 揭阳市人民医院
出处 《内科急危重症杂志》 2020年第6期479-483,共5页 Journal of Critical Care In Internal Medicine
基金 广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(No:A2019350)。
关键词 伊马替尼 慢性髓性白血病 预后 Imatinib Chronic myeloid leukemia Prognostic related factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献55

  • 1贺其图,时风桐,袁祖正.包头市白血病流行病学调查[J].内蒙古医学杂志,1993,13(2):3-5. 被引量:10
  • 2江倩,陈珊珊,江滨,江浩,丘镜滢,刘艳荣,张艳,秦亚溱,陆颖,黄晓军,陆道培.甲磺酸伊马替尼治疗慢性粒细胞白血病慢性期100例追踪观察[J].中华血液学杂志,2006,27(11):721-726. 被引量:39
  • 3National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, V.2.2008. NCCN Web Site.8-28-2007. Accessed October 25, 2007. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/ physician- gls/f-guidelines.asp#cml.
  • 4Druker BJ, Lee SJ. Chapter 43: Chronic Leukemias: Section I: Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia// C anc er Principles and Practice of Oncology.2007.
  • 5唐正贤,孙秋云,张金桃,等.上海市金山县11年内血病流行病学调查[J].中华血液学杂志,1994,15(8):430.
  • 6Kalmanti L, Saussele S, Lauseker M, et al. Safety and efficacy of imatinib in CML over a period of 10 years: data from the randomized CML-study IV[J]. Leukemia, 2015, 29(5):1123-1132.
  • 7Larson RA, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, et al. Nilotinib vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome- positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 3-year follow-up[J]. Leukemia, 2012, 26(10):2197-2203.
  • 8Wang J, Shen ZX, Saglio G, et al. Phase 3 study of nifotinib vs imatinib in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTchina[J]. Blood, 2015, 125(18):2771-2778.
  • 9Cortes JE, Saglio G, Kantaijian HM, et al. Final 5-Year Study Results of DASISION: The Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(20):2333-2340.
  • 10Hughes TP, Ross DM. Moving treatment- free remission into mainstream clinical practice in CML[J]. Blood, 2016,128(1):17-23.

共引文献146

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部