期刊文献+

汉斯·赖欣巴哈概率归纳逻辑思想的再解读 被引量:1

Reinterpretation of Hans Reichenbach’s Thought of Probability Induction Logic
原文传递
导出
摘要 1.赖欣巴哈的概率归纳逻辑思想起源于20世纪科学革命的激发。爱因斯坦相对论挑战了康德的先验综合判断的基础,显示了经验证据的威力。海森伯的不确定性原理表明,基础主义的绝对确定性只是梦想。2.基于逻辑的形式结构,必须与世界的逻辑结构互相配对的理念,赖欣巴哈按客观主义采用了概率的"频率解释",并且建构了概率归纳逻辑的公理体系。3.在认知科学、心理逻辑取得新发展的背景下,按照真理实用论精神,对概率归纳逻辑思想重新进行合理性辩护。 1. Hans Reichenbach’s thought of probability inductive logic originated from the inspiration of the scientific revolution in the 20 th century. Einstein’s theory of relativity challenged the basis of Kant’s synthetic a priori judgment and showed the power of empirical evidence. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle shows that the absolute certainty of fundamentalism is only a dream. 2. Based on the idea that the formal structure of logic must be matched with the logical structure of the world, Hans Reichenbach adopted the frequency interpretation of probability according to objectivism and constructed the axiom system of probability inductive logic. 3. Under the background of the new development of cognitive science and psychological logic, and in accordance with the spirit of the theory of truth pragmatism, the rationality of the thought of probability induction logic is re-defended.
作者 黄海 桂起权 HUANG Hai;GUI Qi-quan(School of Marxism Studies,Xuchang University,Xuchang 461000;College of Marxism,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387;School of Philosophy,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072,China)
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第11期92-98,共7页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“现代归纳逻辑的新发展、理论前沿与应用研究”(15ZDB018) 中国博士后科学基金项目“贝叶斯网络不确定性推理研究”(2017M620094)。
关键词 赖欣巴哈 概率归纳逻辑 极限频率 认定实用主义辩护 Reichenbach probability induction logic limiting frequency Posit pragmatism defense
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1E. Walker, Cognitive Science, 1978: Report of the State of the Art Committee to the Advisors of theAlfred P. Sloan Foundation, Unpublished, http://www, cbi. umn. edu/hostedpublications/pdf/Cognitive Science 1978 _ OCR.pdf, p. 75.
  • 2D. Norman, "What is Cognitive Science?" in D. Norman, ed., Perspectives on Cognitive Science, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1981, p. 1.
  • 3George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and lts Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 3.
  • 4Cf. John R. Searle, "Social Ontology, " Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress, London: King's College Publications, 2008.
  • 5B.R赫根汉.《心理学史导论》(上册),郭本禹等译,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2004年,第411页.
  • 6W.W.巴特利.《维特根斯坦传》,杜丽燕译,上海:东方出版中心,2000年,第116页.
  • 7Z. Pylyshyn, Information Science: Its Roots and Relations as Viewed from the Perspective of Cognitive Science, in F. Machlup and U. Mansfield, eds., The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages, New York: Wiley, 1983, p. 76.
  • 8R, A. Griggs and J. R. Cox, "The Elusive Thematic-materials Effect in Wason's Selection Task," British Journal of Psychology, vol. 73, 1982, pp. 407-420.
  • 9G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, pp. 5-7.
  • 10Mihail C. Roco and William Sims Bainbridge, eds., Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science, Dordreeht/ Boston/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

共引文献107

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部